The Relationship Between Neuropsychiatric Diagnoses and Revision Surgery After Breast Reconstruction

Seitz, Allison J.; Attaluri, Pradeep; Edalatpour, Armin; Wood, Kasey Leigh; Nkana, Zeeda H.; Michelotti, Brett; Poore, Samuel O.

doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000003268

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…11,17 Some studies suggest that patients with psychiatric disorders such as anxiety may be more likely to undergo revision procedures, although the evidence is inconclusive. [18][19][20] While previous studies have explored factors associated with increased revision rates, few studies have investigated the impact of revision procedures on patient satisfaction. Given that these elective revision procedures carry risk, require recovery time, and have financial implications, it is important to investigate whether they in fact improve patient satisfaction.…”

Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of Elective Revision after Breast Reconstruction on Patient-Reported Outcomes

Zong,

Leibl,

Weichman

2024

J Reconstr Microsurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There has been increasing emphasis on patient-reported satisfaction as a measure of surgical outcomes. While previous research has investigated factors influencing patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction, there are few studies on how patient satisfaction is impacted by revision procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether elective revisions following breast reconstruction are significantly associated with changes in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent immediate autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2015-2021. Patients were included if they had completed BREAST-Q pre-operatively, post-initial reconstruction, and post-revision procedures. Patients were excluded if they received adjuvant radiation or if they had previously undergone breast reconstruction procedures. The primary outcome measures were BREAST-Q domains. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were also analyzed. Results: Of the 123 patients included for analysis, 61 underwent autologous breast reconstruction and 62 underwent alloplastic reconstruction. Mean age was 49.31 ± 11.58 years and BMI was 29.55 ± 5.63 kg/m2. 48 patients underwent no revision procedures and 75 patients underwent at least one revision. Between these two groups, there were no differences in age, BMI, complication rates, socioeconomic status, or pre-operative BREAST-Q scores. Patients reported significantly higher satisfaction with outcome after their first revision compared to after initial reconstruction alone (p=0.04). Autologous reconstruction patients who had at least one revision had significantly higher Satisfaction with Outcome (p=0.02) and Satisfaction with Surgeon (p=0.05) in the 2-year follow-up period compared to patients who had no revisions. Conclusion: Revision procedures following autologous breast reconstruction are associated with higher patient satisfaction with outcome. Further research should explore specific factors influencing patient decision-making regarding whether to undergo revisions.

show abstract

Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…11 18 Some studies suggest that patients with psychiatric disorders such as anxiety may be more likely to undergo revision procedures, although the evidence is inconclusive. 19 20 21…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%