The relationship between ownership structure, capital structure and corporate governance practices

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of corporate governance practised by co-operatives and mutual societies in New Zealand and whether there is any relationship between co-operatives’ ownership structure, capital structure and agency costs. The study also explores whether the capital structure and the ownership structure changed during the period 2005-2011. Design/methodology/approach – Panel data for the period 2005-2011 are analysed using ordinary least squares regression and the Tobit model regression. The authors have used operating expense to sales, asset utilisation and ROA as the dependent variables. Findings – The findings indicate that an increase in independent directors, board member experience and size (measured by total annual sales) reduces agency costs in co-operatives and mutuals in New Zealand. Also, borrowing from members rather than banks reduces agency cost and increases profitability in co-operatives and mutuals. Research limitations/implications – Caution should be exercised when generalising the findings of the study as it is restricted to New Zealand environment and the sample size used is relatively small. Practical implications – This study offers insights for policy makers internationally who are interested in adopting similar corporate governance practices in their own countries. Within New Zealand, the corporate governance debate associated with co-operatives and mutual societies will be better informed as a direct consequence of this research. Originality/value – This is the first study that extends the research undertaken by Ang et al. (2000) and Singh and Davidson (2003) to the cooperative and mutual business model in New Zealand.

Supervisory Board and Company Borrowing: The Case of Developing Economics

“…They found mean value of leverage is 36% . Proportion of supervisory board independence is 0.38 which is not diffrent from Reddy & Locke (2014). The mean value of supervisory board size is four persons which is smaller than that found in a prior study by Tarus & Ayabei (2016), who found the average board size is 8.46.…”

Analysis on corporate governance compliance standards in New Zealand – a qualitative study on disclosures using content analysis and interviews

“…According to the OECD steering committee on corporate governance, the financial crisis can be attributed to failures and weaknesses in corporate governance practices (Kirkpatrick, 2009). In this regard, researchers have questioned whether boards have the skills, knowledge and understanding of the business to fulfil their duties (Reddy and Locke, 2014); others argue that board failures are the result of the lack of shareholder monitoring (Icahn, 2009).…”

Can Greater Levels of Cooperation Help to Improve Productivity and Resilience in UK Agriculture Post Brexit Drawing Comparisons with the New Zealand Dairy Industry Experience?

“…A literature review on the performance of cooperative organisations in comparison to investor owner firms shows contradicting views. While some scholars claim that cooperative organisations perform better and are more resilient than investor owner firms, other scholars suggest the opposite (Nilsson, Kyriakopoulos & Meulenberg, 2004;Bijman & Ilpopoulos, 2014;Reddy & Locke, 2014). Mullen (2010) reports that in New Zealand, since the 1990s, productivity growth in agriculture has outstripped productivity growth in the wider New Zealand economy.…”