2019
DOI: 10.1037/emo0000512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between pain-induced autonomic arousal and perceived duration.

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(137 reference statements)
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robustness of temporal discrimination to ToT-related changes in vagal activity is in line with the findings of recent studies showing that vagus-mediated HRV is associated with temporal perception mainly if the temporal stimulus per se is a source of arousal (e.g., an emotional picture; Piovesan et al, 2018; Ogden et al, 2019). Accordingly, in the current study, we used emotionally neutral stimuli without a stimulatory effect on arousal and probably having a weaker association with vagal-mediated HRV functions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The robustness of temporal discrimination to ToT-related changes in vagal activity is in line with the findings of recent studies showing that vagus-mediated HRV is associated with temporal perception mainly if the temporal stimulus per se is a source of arousal (e.g., an emotional picture; Piovesan et al, 2018; Ogden et al, 2019). Accordingly, in the current study, we used emotionally neutral stimuli without a stimulatory effect on arousal and probably having a weaker association with vagal-mediated HRV functions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further, where task difficulty is either unknown (Richter & Gendolla, 2009) or user-defined (Wright, Killebrew, & Pimpalapure, 2002) mirroring the adaptive coping situation in sequential decisions sympathetic states uniquely track reward relevance, suggesting they may be involved with learning the opportunity cost of an environment. Such a link would be supported by recent perceived duration studies reporting a specific association between sympathetic activation and the overestimation of the duration of a painful stimulus (electro-cutaneous stimulation; Piovesan, Mirams, Poole, Moore, & Ogden, 2018). In addition, the association between sympathetic activation and duration overestimation appears to be specific to adaptive events of negative valence, for example, reporting the duration of the presentation of a high-arousal, negative-valence image (a mutilated body) versus a neutral or positive image (Ogden, Henderson, McGlone, & Richter, 2019;van Hedger, Necka, Barakzai, & Norman, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Critically, the bottom-up relationship between arousal and perceived duration proposed in these models implies that any increase in physiological arousal should subjectively lengthen perceived duration and any reduction in physiological arousal should subjectively shorten perceived duration. However, recent studies directly testing the relationship between physiological arousal (SNS and PSNS reactivity) and emotional distortions to time, have failed to demonstrate this universally for all types of emotional stimuli [29, 30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Piovesan et al, (2018) [30] tested the relationship between SNS (indexed by skin conductance level) and PSNS activity (indexed by HF-HRV) and distortions to the perceived duration of painful stimuli. In two experiments, participants estimated the duration electro-cutaneous stimulation delivered at levels inducing no pain, low pain and high pain (experiment 1), or, participants estimated the duration of a neutral visual stimulus whilst experiencing continuous thermal pain delivered at levels inducing no pain, low pain and high pain (experiment 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%