1992
DOI: 10.1016/0168-3659(92)90067-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between peptide structure and transport across epithelial cell monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interacting with the lipid phase peptides may translocate through membrane by forming pores or inverted micelles or diffuse through the bilayer (11). Peptide diffusion has been considered as improbable because it requires high desolvation energy (53,54). Another model proposes that hydrophilic CPPs translocate across the membrane by forming pores through oligomerization of several peptide molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interacting with the lipid phase peptides may translocate through membrane by forming pores or inverted micelles or diffuse through the bilayer (11). Peptide diffusion has been considered as improbable because it requires high desolvation energy (53,54). Another model proposes that hydrophilic CPPs translocate across the membrane by forming pores through oligomerization of several peptide molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard method for determination of hydrogen bonding (desolvation potential) involves measurement of the difference between the logarithms of the partition coefficients in a hydrogen bonding solvent (octanol) and a non-hydrogen bonding lipophilic organic solvent (isooctane) [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Implicit in this method is that the hydrophobic effects are similar in both organic solvent systems so that the difference in partitioning is explained by the ability of the organic solvent to accommodate the hydrogen bonding requirement of the solute, providing a direct measurement of the hydrogen bonding potential.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference logP C16/W − logP O/W (formally equal to logP C16/O ) is frequently considered an indicator of the hydrogen-bonding ability 65,[79][80][81] and, consequently, as a parameter characterizing the preferential location of the solutes in the bilayer. The fraction of compounds present in the core as a function of logP C16/O is plotted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%