2020
DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2020.1744280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between perceived parenting dimensions, attachment, and pre-adolescent bullying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Olweus (2012) defines cyberbullying as bullying via electronic means such as mobile/cell phones or the internet. Carter et al (2020) report that parent-child attachment mediated the associations between parental firm control and two types of bullying experiences: physical and verbal bullying. Padmanabhanunni and Gerhardt (2018) also found that aggression reduction interventions for children from disadvantaged areas need to consider the role of gender and family-related factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Olweus (2012) defines cyberbullying as bullying via electronic means such as mobile/cell phones or the internet. Carter et al (2020) report that parent-child attachment mediated the associations between parental firm control and two types of bullying experiences: physical and verbal bullying. Padmanabhanunni and Gerhardt (2018) also found that aggression reduction interventions for children from disadvantaged areas need to consider the role of gender and family-related factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Padmanabhanunni and Gerhardt (2018) also found that aggression reduction interventions for children from disadvantaged areas need to consider the role of gender and family-related factors. The works of Carter et al (2020) and Padmanabhanunni and Gerhardt (2018) are precursors that bullying and its cyber-related forms need remediating attention. It is also worth stating Andrew Tetteh, Fred Awaah and Dorcas Addo all are based at the Department of Business Administration, University of Professional Studies, Accra, Ghana.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies focused on junior and senior high school students, and few have paid attention to the heterogeneity of bullying victimization among elementary school students. Studies that investigated bullying victimization among elementary students mainly considered participants as a homogeneous group, such that the findings reflected an overall situation of such groups (Carter et al, 2020; Sakellariou et al, 2012) and ignored individual differences. Therefore, it is important to consider individual differences within victim groups and explore the combination and distribution of different bullying victimization forms in elementary students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, age restrictions on social media, less sophisticated phone and Internet skills, and parental monitoring of online behavior make a relatively low incidence of cyberbullying among elementary students (Carter et al, 2020; Sakellariou et al, 2012). Therefore, this study focused on physical, verbal, and relational bullying, and did not include cyberbullying in the exploration of bullying victimization patterns among elementary students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to externalizing behaviors and internalizing symptoms, PPC has been associated with developmental outcomes such as poor self-concept (e.g., Choe et al, 2020b), low self-esteem (e.g., Huey et al, 2020), poor emotion regulation (Gong & Wang, 2021), aggression justifying beliefs (Choe et al, 2022), low empathy (e.g., Choe et al, 2020b), poor friendship (Dickson et al, 2018), poor relationship qualities (e.g., Choe et al, 2021), and poor academic functioning (e.g., Xu et al, 2020). Moreover, PPC has been studied in diverse cultures; we list geographic locations where PPC has been studied as a proxy for culture, based on Lansford (2022): Belgium (e.g., Brenning et al, 2020), the Netherlands (e.g., van der Bruggen et al, 2010), Finland (e.g., Zarra-Nezhad et al, 2020, Italy (e.g., Basili et al, 2021), Lithuania (e.g., , Latvia (Sebre et al, 2015), Norway (Nyhus & Webley, 2013), Switzerland (e.g., Van Petegem et al, 2019), Sweden (Van Zalk & Kerr, 2011), Germany (Rueth et al, 2017), Greece (e.g., Kokkinos & Vlavianou, 2019), the UK (Stafford et al, 2016), Denmark (e.g., Lønfeldt et al, 2017), Romania (Robila & Krishnakumar, 2006), China (e.g., Wu et al, 2021), Hong Kong (e.g., Shek et al, 2019), Taiwan (e.g., Hsieh, 2020), South Korea (e.g., Choi et al, 2021), India (Tiwari & Verma, 2012), Australia (Gittins et al, 2020), South Africa (Carter et al, 2020), Ethiopia (Bireda & von Krosigk, 2015), Ghana (Salaam & Mounts, 2016), Pakistan…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%