2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between perceptions of an innovative environment and creative performance in an online synchronous environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in most of the enterprises interviewed, we found that these enterprises have a common feature: high cohesion, good innovation atmosphere and strong learning atmosphere within the organization. Enterprises provide employees with an open and free working environment, and encourage employees to boldly try and continue to learn; this corporate culture is very conducive to the innovation and development of enterprises [53].…”
Section: Micro-factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in most of the enterprises interviewed, we found that these enterprises have a common feature: high cohesion, good innovation atmosphere and strong learning atmosphere within the organization. Enterprises provide employees with an open and free working environment, and encourage employees to boldly try and continue to learn; this corporate culture is very conducive to the innovation and development of enterprises [53].…”
Section: Micro-factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous education should begin in kindergartens, teaching to think creatively and continuously seek effective solutions to nonstandard tasks from an early age. Creativity of any enterprise is formed from the union of the employees' creative abilities [7]; therefore, the higher the share of innovation-minded people will be in the region, the higher the stability of the economy will be characterized as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because hands‐on ability acted on the overall creative product design, hands‐on ability assessment indicators were used to evaluate the students' handmade products (windmill generators). Based on the importance of the product's external appearance and internal function, the hands‐on ability assessment indicators were based on the Creative Idea Scale (Chang, ; Chang & Yu, ). The Creative Idea Scale was suitable for evaluating a handmade product (Chang, ; Chang & Yu, ), and it included four subscales of the 10 indicators, which were evaluated using a 5‐point Likert scale: Novelty (Material, Shape, Structure), Newness (Originality, Unfamiliarity), Feasibility (Feasibility, Integrity), and Value (Elaboration and Aesthetic, Performance, Multifunctional).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the importance of the product's external appearance and internal function, the hands‐on ability assessment indicators were based on the Creative Idea Scale (Chang, ; Chang & Yu, ). The Creative Idea Scale was suitable for evaluating a handmade product (Chang, ; Chang & Yu, ), and it included four subscales of the 10 indicators, which were evaluated using a 5‐point Likert scale: Novelty (Material, Shape, Structure), Newness (Originality, Unfamiliarity), Feasibility (Feasibility, Integrity), and Value (Elaboration and Aesthetic, Performance, Multifunctional). The interrater reliability of these four subscales was examined by correlation coefficients, which were 0.948, 0.946, 0.844, and 0.931, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%