1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02139938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between phosphate absorption and root length in nine wheat cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and longer root hairs. As a general adaptive mechanism to low P supply a higher ratio of root to shoot growth-rate (F6hse et al, 1988; Table 2), an absolute increase in root length at moderate P deficiency (R6mer et al, 1988;Fig. 2) and an increased root-hair length (F6hse et al, 1983.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) and longer root hairs. As a general adaptive mechanism to low P supply a higher ratio of root to shoot growth-rate (F6hse et al, 1988; Table 2), an absolute increase in root length at moderate P deficiency (R6mer et al, 1988;Fig. 2) and an increased root-hair length (F6hse et al, 1983.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Römer et al (1989), entretanto, mencionaram que, para plantas de trigo com 21 dias, na presença de disponibilidade adequada de fósforo, o sistema radicular não foi importante para discriminar a eficiência de absorção e, quando em baixa disponibilidade, pode ter havido adaptação por meio do aumento das raízes ou mesmo da efetividade da absorção de fósforo por unidade de raiz. A seleção de plantas eficientes, portanto, poderia ser efetuada, procurando esta adaptação aliada às maiores produtividades.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Measures of Pi uptake rates have been commonly standardized by dividing by cm or m of length, or mg or g of biomass (Drew et al, 1984;Lefebvre and Glass, 1982;Nielsen and Barber, 1978;R6mer et al, 1989). In most published reports, raw data are not provided, and hence, it is difficult to determine whether or not uptake rate is linearly related to root length or biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach for calculating this measure involves dividing influx by root length or biomass (Chapin and Bieleski, 1982;Drew et al, 1984;Lefebvre and Glass, 1982). This has been used as a method of standardizing influx for differences in root size to make comparisons between species or between genotypes within species (F6hse et al, 1988;Furlani et al, 1984;R6mer et al, 1989;Schjorring and Nielsen, 1987). A number of these studies have suggested that genotypes with small roots have higher uptake rates per unit of root size (Frhse et al, 1988;Furlani et al, 1984;Schjorring and Nielsen, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%