2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-6256-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between physical activity and 2-hydroxyestrone, 16α-hydroxyestrone, and the 2/16 ratio in premenopausal women (United States)

Abstract: These results indicate that physical activity may modulate estrogen metabolism to favor the weak estrogen, 2-OHE1, thus producing a higher 2/16 ratio. This alteration in estrogen metabolism may represent one of the mechanisms by which increased physical activity reduces breast cancer risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the three early studies (21)(22)(23), sample sizes were small (i.e., five to seven participants per group), menstrual function was not standardized (resulting in comparisons between individuals with and without menstrual dysfunction and women with different reproductive ages), self-reported physical activity measures were used (i.e., swim distance, running mileage, and participation in a varsityrowing program), and the studies used an older version of RIA (21,22) or administration of a labeled tracer (23) to measure estrogen metabolites, which are not as valid as the newer solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (30,36). Methodologic improvements are evident in three more recent studies (24,25,37), namely the use of larger sample sizes, standardized menstrual status, and analysis of estrogen metabolites using a newer solid-phase enzyme immunoassay. However, all have used BMI as a measure of adiposity, which is problematic, especially for more athletic populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the three early studies (21)(22)(23), sample sizes were small (i.e., five to seven participants per group), menstrual function was not standardized (resulting in comparisons between individuals with and without menstrual dysfunction and women with different reproductive ages), self-reported physical activity measures were used (i.e., swim distance, running mileage, and participation in a varsityrowing program), and the studies used an older version of RIA (21,22) or administration of a labeled tracer (23) to measure estrogen metabolites, which are not as valid as the newer solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (30,36). Methodologic improvements are evident in three more recent studies (24,25,37), namely the use of larger sample sizes, standardized menstrual status, and analysis of estrogen metabolites using a newer solid-phase enzyme immunoassay. However, all have used BMI as a measure of adiposity, which is problematic, especially for more athletic populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all have used BMI as a measure of adiposity, which is problematic, especially for more athletic populations. Two studies (24,25) used self-reports of physical activity levels, which suffer from several methodologic issues, particularly overreporting of frequency, duration, and intensity (38). One study (37) used an objective measure of chronic exercise, VO 2max .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations