The relationship between physical aggression, foreign policy and moral choices: Phenotypic and genetic findings

Abstract

Previous work has demonstrated that both leaders and other individuals vary in dispositional levels of physical aggression, which are genetically influenced. Yet the importance of individual differences in aggression for attitudes toward foreign policy or context-laden moral choices, such as sacrificing the lives of some for the greater good of many, has yet to be fully explored. Given the global importance of such decisions, we undertook this exploration in a sample of 586 Australians, including 250 complete twin pairs. We found that individuals who scored higher on Buss-Perry's physical aggression scale were more likely to support aggressive foreign policy interventions and displayed a more utilitarian moral calculus than those who scored lower on this scale. Furthermore, we found that the majority of variance in physical aggression lay in genetic factors for men, whereas the majority of the variance was in environmental factors for women. The source of covariation between aggression and political choices also differed between the sexes. A combination of genetic and environmental factors accounted for most of the cross-trait correlations among males, whereas common and unique environmental factors accounted for most of the cross-trait correlations among females. We consider the implications of our results for understanding how trait measures of aggression are associated with foreign policy and moral choices, providing evidence for why and how individuals differ in responding to complex social dilemmas. Aggr. Behav. 43:37-46, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Relation Between Personality Traits and Violence Tendency in Nursing Students

“…This result is in parallel with other studies (Ameri et al 2017;Karayağız Muslu et al,2020;Ulu, 2016;Yüksel et al 2015). There are studies which indicate that physical aggression is environment-related for females and geneticsrelated for males (McDermott and Hatemi, 2017). It was considered that males have a higher violence tendency in relation to possessing biologically androgen and testosterone traits and due to social roles assigned to genders (Kaplan and Aksel, 2013).…”

The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization.

“…Leading cognitive-based theories in political psychology argue that a person’s idiosyncratic psychological needs and traits contribute to the adoption of particular political views (Jost et al, 2003; McDermott & Hatemi, 2017). A now classic theory reasons that a conservative worldview can satisfy the “epistemic need” for a predictable, organized social environment and clear-cut principles about how the world works (Baron & Jost, 2019; Hibbing et al, 2015; Jost & Amodio, 2012; Jost et al, 2009; Jost et al, 2003; Jost et al, 2007).…”

Public Opinion and Decisions About Military Force in Democracies

“…The experiment indicated that, 4. Bell and Quek 2018;Chaudoin 2014;Chu 2019;Flores-Macías and Kreps 2017;Gelpi, Feaver, and Reifler 2009;Herrmann 2017;Herrmann, Tetlock, and Visser 1999;Johns andDavies 2012, 2014;Kertzer and Brutger 2016;Kertzer et al 2014;Levendusky and Horowitz 2012;McDermott and Hatemi 2017;Milner and Tingley 2016;Prather 2019;Press, Sagan, and Valentino 2013;Stein 2019;Tingley 2017;Tomz 2007;Tomz and Weeks 2013;Trager and Vavreck 2011;Weiss andDafoe 2019. 5.…”