2009
DOI: 10.1177/0363546509343198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Posterior Tibial Slope and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Abstract: Despite the identification of an increased posterior tibial slope as a possible risk factor for women, more research that combines the multifactorial nature of an ACL injury must be performed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
211
4
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
211
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We suppose that a greater MS reduces AP knee stability analogous to a resection or injury of the posterior meniscus. It is unclear whether an injury risk resulting from a greater PTS is modified by the MS. Two recent studies [20,47] link a greater PTS to noncontact ACL injury in women, who reportedly are at a greater risk for such injury than men [18]. These data suggest gender-specific assessments of the PTS and MS would be important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We suppose that a greater MS reduces AP knee stability analogous to a resection or injury of the posterior meniscus. It is unclear whether an injury risk resulting from a greater PTS is modified by the MS. Two recent studies [20,47] link a greater PTS to noncontact ACL injury in women, who reportedly are at a greater risk for such injury than men [18]. These data suggest gender-specific assessments of the PTS and MS would be important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A sample size of 54 individuals for both groups was calculated to detect a 1.5°difference with a power of 0.94 at an a-error of 0.05. The targeted primary outcome variable was set to 1.5°b ecause PTS differences reported in the literature range from 0.9°-3.4° [8,46,47]. The typical errors for interobserver and intraobserver variability related to the method used herein are 1.4°and 1.2°, respectively [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations