2018
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jby026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between price and retail concentration: evidence from the US food industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other traditional retailers-such as traditional markets and neighborhood kiosks-may also be affected negatively by further supermarket expansion, but to a lesser extent than grocery stores. These types of competitive relationships between modern and traditional retailers are in line with earlier observations in Asia, Europe, and the USA [26,40,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Use Of Modern Retailerssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other traditional retailers-such as traditional markets and neighborhood kiosks-may also be affected negatively by further supermarket expansion, but to a lesser extent than grocery stores. These types of competitive relationships between modern and traditional retailers are in line with earlier observations in Asia, Europe, and the USA [26,40,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Use Of Modern Retailerssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Note that while endogeneity of most firm‐specific variables is intuitive, classical industrial organization literature has, in particular, pointed towards potential endogeneity of industry concentration due to reverse causality between firm performance and industry structure as well as omitted variables (e.g., Evans et al, 1993; Froeb & Werden, 1991). Our IV strategy is therefore in line with recent literature in which estimation biases are mitigated by either constructing instruments or employing lagged values of concentration as instrumental variable (Hovhannisyan, Cho, & Bozic, 2019).…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Along these lines, Hovhannisyan and Bozic (2016) argue that retailer bargaining power can have implications, not only for horizontal competition but also for vertical relationships along the supply chain. These include adverse effects for small food processors and farmers, decreased consumer welfare and higher prices as well as lower productivity growth (Griffith & Harmgart, 2012; Hovhannisyan et al, 2019; Sexton & Xia, 2018). For example, Carstensen (2000) shows that strategic behavior by dominant retailers can reduce the ability of agricultural producers to act as independent entrepreneurs.…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russo and Goodhue, 2018;Li et al, 2006), we find empirical inconsistencies in food prices which deviate from the expectations derived from perfect competition models. Recent developments, such as the increased power concentration of retailers (Hovhannisyan et al, 2018), led to an increased attention towards farmer-retail relations in agricultural supply chains (Sexton, 2013).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This especially holds in modern agricultural markets, with abundance of food for most consumers in developed countries (e.g. Koning et al, 2008;Sexton, 2013), as well as increased concentration of the largest global retail companies (Hovhannisyan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%