2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1185078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between processing speed and remodeling spatial patterns of intrinsic brain activity in the elderly with different sleep duration

Abstract: ObjectiveBrain neuroplasticity in which sleep affects the speed of information processing in the elderly population has not been reported. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore the effects of sleep on information processing speed and its central plasticity mechanism in the elderly.MethodsA total of 50 individuals aged 60 and older were enrolled in this case control study. All subjects were divided into two groups according to the sleep time: short sleep duration (< 360 min) (6 men and 19 women;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of resting-state data was performed with RESTplus V1.2 (the Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit plus V1.2, http://restfmri.net/forum/RESTplusV1.2 ), to perform amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) or regional homogeneity (ReHo) computations. In line with our previous research [ 21 , 22 ], we followed the same data processing protocol by discarding the initial ten volumes of each subject to reach signal equilibrium, then the processing procedure including: (1) time correction of slice scans; (2) the correction of head movement (all head movements were below 2.5 mm or 2.5° in any direction); (3) aligning the functional brain images to the standard EPI template through spatial normalization; (4) regression of nuisance variables, including the white matter and cerebral spinal fluid blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals and head motion with six motion profiles; (5) spatial smoothing using a Gaussian kernel with a full width at half maximum of 6 mm before the ALFF calculation and after ReHo calculation; (6) removal of linear trends; (7) ALFF and ReHo calculations for the traditional low-frequency band (0.01–0.08 Hz), and (8) transformation of both ALFF and ReHo values into a Z score (zALFF and zReHo)for further comparison between groups.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The analysis of resting-state data was performed with RESTplus V1.2 (the Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit plus V1.2, http://restfmri.net/forum/RESTplusV1.2 ), to perform amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) or regional homogeneity (ReHo) computations. In line with our previous research [ 21 , 22 ], we followed the same data processing protocol by discarding the initial ten volumes of each subject to reach signal equilibrium, then the processing procedure including: (1) time correction of slice scans; (2) the correction of head movement (all head movements were below 2.5 mm or 2.5° in any direction); (3) aligning the functional brain images to the standard EPI template through spatial normalization; (4) regression of nuisance variables, including the white matter and cerebral spinal fluid blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals and head motion with six motion profiles; (5) spatial smoothing using a Gaussian kernel with a full width at half maximum of 6 mm before the ALFF calculation and after ReHo calculation; (6) removal of linear trends; (7) ALFF and ReHo calculations for the traditional low-frequency band (0.01–0.08 Hz), and (8) transformation of both ALFF and ReHo values into a Z score (zALFF and zReHo)for further comparison between groups.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%