1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00031-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Salivary Cortisol Concentrations in Frozen Versus Mailed Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
132
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither testosterone nor cortisol was correlated with the time interval between sampling and freezing (p's > .25). In line with this, previous studies have shown that saliva samples can be mailed and/or stored at room temperature for at least 7 days and sometimes up to 4 weeks without cortisol or testosterone levels being affected (Clements & Parker, 1998;Dabbs, 1991;Garde & Hansen, 2005;Gröschl, Wagner, Rauh, & Dörr, 2001;Jensen et al, 2011;Kirschbaum & Hellhammer, 1989.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Neither testosterone nor cortisol was correlated with the time interval between sampling and freezing (p's > .25). In line with this, previous studies have shown that saliva samples can be mailed and/or stored at room temperature for at least 7 days and sometimes up to 4 weeks without cortisol or testosterone levels being affected (Clements & Parker, 1998;Dabbs, 1991;Garde & Hansen, 2005;Gröschl, Wagner, Rauh, & Dörr, 2001;Jensen et al, 2011;Kirschbaum & Hellhammer, 1989.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…When returned, saliva samples were stored in a sub-zero freezer until packaged in dry ice and couriered to the University of Trier, Germany, for cortisol assaying. Cortisol levels are robust to environmental conditions associated with the shipping process (Clements and Parker, 1998). Cortisol levels were determined in duplicate using a competitive solid phase time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay with fluorometric end point detection (Dressendorfer et al, 1992).…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 1484 study subjects consented to salivary collection, and 1208 (81.4% of consenting subjects) actually returned their saliva samples. We excluded 93 subjects due to documented incompliance with the sampling procedure, 67 subjects for exceeding the allowed 7-day time period between salivary collection and sample arrival (20), 23 due to systemic glucocorticoid therapy, and 12 as they had reached an age outside the defined range at the time of sampling. We also excluded samples with saliva cortisol concentrations exceeding three S.Ds above the mean and subjects who had woken up beyond the range of plus/minus three S.Ds of the mean wake-up time of 0744 h (0422-1106 h, five subjects).…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 99%