The relationship between self-efficacy for group work, perceived usefulness, flow, perceived interaction, and learning outcomes in team project-based learning with closed-type SNS

Effects of Action Learning-based Pediatric Nursing Practice Education Program on Problem Solving Abilities, Competency in Nursing Skills, Self-efficacy for Group Work, and Team Efficacy of Nursing College Students

“…19 questions were answered with a five-point scale; the higher the score, the better the cooperative self-efficacy. The internal reliability of the measurement tools by Alavi and McCormick [21] at the time of development was .95; the Cronbach's alpha was .93 in Kim [20], and in this study, the pre-test reliability was .95, and in the post-test, .94. Team efficiency is a belief on a collaborative level that enables teams achieve the entrusted tasks, a shared belief among the team constituents in the ability of the group [22]; this means that each individual believes in the team's ability to successfully perform a given learning task with the team members [6].…”

“…The Selfefficacy for group work means a belief in one's ability to successfully participate in collaborative learning-activities to carry out group works [19], and in this study, it should be interpreted as whether the student believes that he/she can contribute to cooperative work. The measuring tool used was approved by Kim [20], who translated and modified the 'self-efficacy for group work measure' developed by Alavi and McCormick [21]. 19 questions were answered with a five-point scale; the higher the score, the better the cooperative self-efficacy.…”

The effects of flipped learning and gamification on nursing students’ patient safety education: A mixed method study

“…This study used the modified Korean version [ 21 ] of Alavi and McCormick's [ 22 ] 19-item collective efficacy scale, in which, higher scores represent higher collective efficacy based on a 5-point Likert scale. It consists of 4 sub-factors: exercise of leadership (5 items), exchange of opinions (5 items), opinion evaluation (3 items), and integration of opinions (6 items).…”