2000
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0259:trbssd]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Sexual Size Dimorphism and Habitat Use in Greater Antillean Anolis Lizards

Abstract: Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is the evolutionary result of selection operating differently on the body sizes of males and females. Anolis lizard species of the Greater Antilles have been classified into ecomorph classes, largely on the basis of their structural habitat (perch height and diameter). We show that the major ecomorph classes differ in degree of SSD. At least two SSD classes are supported: high SSD (trunk-crown, trunk-ground) and low SSD (trunk, crown-giant, grass-bush, twig). Differences cannot be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
257
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
11
257
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anoles vary considerably in the extent of sexual dimorphism in body size (Schoener 1969;Stamps 1983;Butler et al 2000), ranging from species in which the sexes are the same size to others in which adult males are more than three times the mass of adult females. The sexes also differ in eco-morphologically relevant proportions of various parts of the body, under the hypothesis that the habitat places constraints on morphology (Schoener 1967;Butler & Losos 2002;Butler et al 2007).…”
Section: Differences In Sexual Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anoles vary considerably in the extent of sexual dimorphism in body size (Schoener 1969;Stamps 1983;Butler et al 2000), ranging from species in which the sexes are the same size to others in which adult males are more than three times the mass of adult females. The sexes also differ in eco-morphologically relevant proportions of various parts of the body, under the hypothesis that the habitat places constraints on morphology (Schoener 1967;Butler & Losos 2002;Butler et al 2007).…”
Section: Differences In Sexual Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major problem is the lack of unambiguous evidence in support of his hypothesis, despite numerous examples of sexual differences in resource use (Temeles 1986;Shine 1989;Butler et al 2000;Pearson et al 2002). One reason for the paucity of evidence is that for the sexes of many species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, natural selection can also explain sex differences in body size if males and females have different niches (Butler et al 2000, Mysterud 2000, Blondel et al 2002, PĂ©rez-BarberĂ­a et al 2002. Differences in emergence and maturation times between females and males could explain SSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%