1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0037-0738(98)00101-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between shellbed type and sequence architecture: examples from Japan and New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Subordinate facies include non-marine lignite and palaeosols, and shallow-marine shellbeds. As for elsewhere in the Wanganui Basin, the succession of facies in the Nukumaru section can be resolved into depositional sequences following the sedimentary facies and shellbed approach developed by Abbott & Carter ( 1994), Naish & Kamp ( 1997), and Kondo et al (1998). These sequences were deposited on the basin margin during successive interglacial sea-level highs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subordinate facies include non-marine lignite and palaeosols, and shallow-marine shellbeds. As for elsewhere in the Wanganui Basin, the succession of facies in the Nukumaru section can be resolved into depositional sequences following the sedimentary facies and shellbed approach developed by Abbott & Carter ( 1994), Naish & Kamp ( 1997), and Kondo et al (1998). These sequences were deposited on the basin margin during successive interglacial sea-level highs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shellbeds regarded as significant in a sequence stratigraphic context are classified following the scheme applied by Naish & Kamp (1997) after Kidwell (1991, fig. 15), and elaborated upon by Kondo et al (1998). Onlap, backlap, compound (a combination of onlap and backlap), and toplap shellbeds are recognised in the Nukumaruan stratotype, the characteristic features of which are summarised in the following.…”
Section: Importance Of Shellbedsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The black pebbles indicate coastal erosion during relative sea-level rise (Strasser 1984). The deposit would therefore be categorized as a transgressive lag (Kondo et al 1998) yet the shell destruction and encrustation commonly associated with such a deposit (Kidwell 1991) is lacking. Therefore, the coquina is interpreted as a complex composite storm accumulation formed during transgression, which possibly underwent repeated burial (Kidwell 1991;Meldahl 1993).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Palaeoenvironment Of The Sur Combe Ronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the recognition of (1) vertically-stacked facies successions bounded by sharp erosion surfaces (sequence boundaries), and (2) the distinctive shellbeds and their associated stratal discontinuities, delineate the stratigraphic geometry of the sequences and allow systems tracts to be differentiated (e.g., sensu Vail 1987). Naish & Kamp (1997a) and Kondo et al (1998), after Kidwell (1991), have recognised onlap, backlap, downlap, and flooding surface shellbeds. These shellbeds are associated, respectively, with the transgressive surface of erosion (TSE), a local flooding surface, the downlap surface, and paracycle-bounding marine flooding surfaces.…”
Section: Sequence Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%