1991
DOI: 10.1080/00382167.1991.9630373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Site Characteristics and Pinus radiata Growth on the Tsitsikamma Plateau, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive correlations between the levels of foliar P and the available P in the soil and the ECEC suggest that an extra input of this element would improve the development of radiata pine, although other factors such as pH, availability of P at depth, mycorrhizal activity and high levels of N may also affect absorption of this element by plants. Despite this, foliar levels of P can by satisfactorily predicted from the concentration of available P in the soil, as has been pointed out in previous studies (Hunter and Gibson, 1984;Louw, 1991), even when the lowest foliar concentrations coincide with low levels of available P in strongly acidic soils. The pH of the soils in the study area was around 4 influencing in the ECEC, whereas Hunter and Gibson (1984) reported an optimum soil pH of 6 for radiata pine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The positive correlations between the levels of foliar P and the available P in the soil and the ECEC suggest that an extra input of this element would improve the development of radiata pine, although other factors such as pH, availability of P at depth, mycorrhizal activity and high levels of N may also affect absorption of this element by plants. Despite this, foliar levels of P can by satisfactorily predicted from the concentration of available P in the soil, as has been pointed out in previous studies (Hunter and Gibson, 1984;Louw, 1991), even when the lowest foliar concentrations coincide with low levels of available P in strongly acidic soils. The pH of the soils in the study area was around 4 influencing in the ECEC, whereas Hunter and Gibson (1984) reported an optimum soil pH of 6 for radiata pine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…On the other hand, many of the plantations in the study (75%) are growing in soils less than 40 cm deep located on steep slopes. Jackson and Gifford (1974) found the highest productivity of radiata pine in soils of depths between 60 and 80 cm and were attributed to the volume of soil available for root exploration and the availability of water and nutrients (Turvey et al, 1986;Louw, 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Curt et al (2001) reported that more than 35% of the observed variance of the Douglas fir site index was explained by former land use. Soil physiological and chemical characteristics have been related to site productivity, and are reported to be critical factors that determine the site productivity in many studies (e.g., Hunter and Gibson 1984;Klinka and Carter 1990;Louw 1991;Wang 1995;Wang and Klinka 1996;Herrera et al 1999). Other studies have successfully modified the performances of site index models by simultaneously using both topographic factors and soil properties (e.g., Takeshita 1964;Trimble 1964;Yamane et al 1990;Corona et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although some drawbacks have been pointed out (e.g., Daubenmire 1976;Richardson et al 1999), site index, defined as the height of dominant trees (i.e., site trees) at a specific reference age, is the most commonly used measure of site productivity for specific species both in Japan and elsewhere (e.g., Takeshita et al 1960;Hägglund 1981;Davis and Jhonson 1987;Wang 1998). Site indices have been modeled for many species in regions such as North America (e.g., Trimble and Weitzman 1956;Trimble 1964;Green et al 1989;Hostin and Titus 1996) and Europe (e.g., Fries et al 1998;Corona et al 1998;Curt 1999;Curt et al 2001), as well as in numerous countries (e.g., Hunter and Gibson 1984;Louw 1991;Herrera et al 1999) including Japan (e.g., Takeshita 1964;Nishizawa et al 1965;Fukushima et al 1974;Yamane et al 1990). Recently, with the development and popularization of the geographic information system (GIS), many site quality models based on digital terrain analysis using a digital elevation model (DEM) have been proposed (e.g., Iverson et al 1997;Chen and Abe 1999;Mitsuda et al 2001;Sturtevant and Seagle 2004;Minowa et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%