2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract: Background Social desirability response bias may lead to inaccurate self-reports and erroneous study conclusions. The present study examined the relationship between social desirability response bias and self-reports of mental health, substance use, and social network factors among a community sample of inner-city substance users. Methods The study was conducted in a sample of 591 opiate and cocaine users in Baltimore, Maryland from 2009–2013. Modified items from the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
236
2
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
236
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, despite the use of a validated screening tool, AUDIT-C screening done at a given time point is still selfreported and may not accurately reflect levels of alcohol consumption in an individual due to recall bias or social desirability bias. (30) However, as AUDIT-C scores were not linked to HCV or treatment in our cohort, our patients were more likely to be truthful in their report. We were also able to improve our assessment of alcohol use by obtaining AUDIT-C scores over time (1 year before and at least 3 months after treatment completion) and incorporating time-varying covariate modeling in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Third, despite the use of a validated screening tool, AUDIT-C screening done at a given time point is still selfreported and may not accurately reflect levels of alcohol consumption in an individual due to recall bias or social desirability bias. (30) However, as AUDIT-C scores were not linked to HCV or treatment in our cohort, our patients were more likely to be truthful in their report. We were also able to improve our assessment of alcohol use by obtaining AUDIT-C scores over time (1 year before and at least 3 months after treatment completion) and incorporating time-varying covariate modeling in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The use of objective, reliable data is a challenge associated with the quality measurement of community pharmacy practice. Self‐report is common and is likely to be associated with social desirability bias . Pharmacy dispensing or claims data have been investigated to derive quality indicators and as a method for avoiding self‐assessment .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social desirability bias (35) is another factor that potentially affected the results. If the respondents had acted in ways or held attitudes that they felt were undesirable, their answers might have been affected.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%