2000
DOI: 10.1121/1.1287711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees

Abstract: Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) procedures were used to measure the amount of speech information perceived in five frequency bands (170-570, 570-1170, 1170-1768, 1768-2680, and 2680-5744 Hz) by 15 users of the Cochlear Ltd. CI-22M implant and Spectra-22/SPEAK processor. The speech information perceived was compared to that perceived by normal-hearing listeners. The ability of these subjects to discriminate between stimulation on adjacent electrodes corresponding to each frequency band was also investigated,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
98
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, frequency resolution in cochlear implant patients (in this case the ability to distin-guish different electrode positions) has also been related to speech perception (Henry et al, 2000).…”
Section: Frequency Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, frequency resolution in cochlear implant patients (in this case the ability to distin-guish different electrode positions) has also been related to speech perception (Henry et al, 2000).…”
Section: Frequency Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly in Mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant users, rate discrimination and tone recognition were significantly correlated (Wei et al, 1999). In the spectral domain, electrode discriminability and spectral resolvability were also found to be correlated with speech performance (Nelson et al, 1995;Henry et al, 2000;Henry and Turner, 2003). However, these correlation studies typically did not address the underlying processing mechanisms.…”
Section: Individual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is presumed that the activation of spatially restricted neural populations is essential for successful CI channel separation and thus for optimum speech discrimination performance in multichannel cochlear implant users (Chatterjee and Shannon 1998;Henry et al 2000;Townsend et al 1987;Throckmorton and Collins 1999;Zwolan et al 1997). To investigate the effects of long-term deafness on spatial selectivity, we determined the STC widths and dynamic ranges of ICC responses.…”
Section: Spatial Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychophysical studies in human CI users have demonstrated that greater channel interaction is negatively correlated with the ability to rank the pitch of individual CI channels (Townsend et al 1987) and with speech discrimination performance (Chatterjee and Shannon 1998;Henry et al 2000;Throckmorton and Collins 1999;Zwolan et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%