2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Teacher-student Rapport and Student s Willingness to Cheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It gives students an unfair advantage and misrepresents their true knowledge and abilities (Adzima 2020). Kalhori (2014) describes academic cheating as an immoral method of achieving a goal in an academic field. Academic cheating in summative assessments is said to be common in all academic institutions and is rooted in, among other things, fear of failure, unpreparedness, overconfidence, and laziness.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives students an unfair advantage and misrepresents their true knowledge and abilities (Adzima 2020). Kalhori (2014) describes academic cheating as an immoral method of achieving a goal in an academic field. Academic cheating in summative assessments is said to be common in all academic institutions and is rooted in, among other things, fear of failure, unpreparedness, overconfidence, and laziness.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic cheating is an immoral way of achieving a goal in the field of academic (Kalhori, 2014). In the context of this study, academic cheating is generally composed of two different forms, cheating in tests and cheating in assignments.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of competency is related to the difficulties encountered by students both in understanding articles and in constructing sentences in English (Smith et al, 2007). According to Kalhori (2014), students cheat because of some extrinsic factors such as maintaining grades and 'successful image' to themselves or to their friends and lacking self-efficacy to complete complex tasks. These deficiencies encourage students to copy assignments from peers without the authors' consent.…”
Section: H1(a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Par ailleurs le mode d'évaluation est mis en question après l'arrivée des nouvelles technologies en classe. La transformation des façons de travailler et l'utilisation des moyens technologiques comme outil d'aide à l'apprentissage et d'accès aux connaissances facilitent par ailleurs le recours au plagiat dont l'augmentation est très visible ces dernières années [4]. Les caractéristiques des apprenants et des étudiants qui fraudent aux examens ou qui plagient des documents par des moyens conventionnels sont désormais bien établis.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified