2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the number of CGG repeats and serum level of anti-Müllerian hormone in women without FMR1 premutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While some recent studies report no association of AMH with CGG repeat number [23,27], one paper reported a positive association, controlling for age, between AMH level and FMR1 repeat number among 197 Korean women at risk for DOR with the largest CGG repeat number of 51 [28]. In contrast, Gleicher et al reported that AMH was lower in women with 35-50 CGG (n=35) than in women with <35 repeats (n=122, p=0.025) [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While some recent studies report no association of AMH with CGG repeat number [23,27], one paper reported a positive association, controlling for age, between AMH level and FMR1 repeat number among 197 Korean women at risk for DOR with the largest CGG repeat number of 51 [28]. In contrast, Gleicher et al reported that AMH was lower in women with 35-50 CGG (n=35) than in women with <35 repeats (n=122, p=0.025) [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, one report found a positive rather than inverse association of AMH and CGG repeat. The population consisted of 197 Korean women "at high risk" of diminished ovarian function, either based on low AFC or family history of FXS (n=7) [2], none of whom carried the premutation. The FMR1 CGG repeats were≤51.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that FMR1 is associated with early ovarian aging and AMH is a common measure of ovarian reserve, it is logical to investigate AMH levels by FMR1 CGG repeat. The scant literature (six publications) on this topic is inconsistent, with some papers reporting an inverse association of AMH and FMR1 CGG repeat length [6,21,28], no association [3,13], and a positive association [2]. Our purpose was to use mathematical modeling to explore whether AMH, as a surrogate for follicular loss, might vary by FMR1 genotype in women diagnosed with DOR, after adjustment for age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study that combined FXS family data from The Netherlands and the US, premutation carriers were found to have lower AMH levels than non-carriers at all ages (multi-level modeling, p < 0.0001) (Spath et al, 2011); As expected, AMH declined with increasing age among both premutation carriers and non-carriers. One paper reported a positive association between AMH level and FMR1 repeat length after controlling for age: among 197 Korean women “at high risk” of diminished ovarian function, where the highest CGG repeat was 51 (Choe et al, 2013), a positive correlation was found between AMH and the CGG repeat length ( p = 0.008). Two recent papers reported no association: a recent report with 372 infertile women from all causes reported no association between AMH and the CGG repeat level (De Geyter et al, 2013), and the sample included some women with premutation and intermediate length alleles.…”
Section: Clinical Markers For Ovarian Reserve (Fsh and Amh) And Fmr1mentioning
confidence: 99%