2005
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the prothrombin upstream sequence element and the G20210A polymorphism: the influence of a competitive environment for mRNA 3'-end formation

Abstract: The human prothrombin G20210A polymorphism located at the 3′ cleavage site of the mRNA results in elevated plasma prothrombin levels and increased risk of venous thrombosis. This polymorphism has been shown to directly influence a variety of processes related to prothrombin mRNA metabolism. We have constructed plasmids that express the full-length prothrombin mRNA that is polyadenylated at its natural site. The A allele prothrombin variant was more efficient than the G allele at promoting cleavage at this site… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indeed turned out to be the case, as has been demonstrated by several in vitro studies (Gehring et al 2001;Pollak et al 2002;Ceelie et al 2004;Danckwardt et al 2004;Sachchithananthan et al 2005). Thus, in the words of Danckwardt et al (2004), ''the physiological G at the cleavage site at position 20210 is the functionally least efficient nucleotide to support 3¢ end processing but has evolved to be physiologically optimal''.…”
Section: Variants That Have Occurred Within the Lasmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This indeed turned out to be the case, as has been demonstrated by several in vitro studies (Gehring et al 2001;Pollak et al 2002;Ceelie et al 2004;Danckwardt et al 2004;Sachchithananthan et al 2005). Thus, in the words of Danckwardt et al (2004), ''the physiological G at the cleavage site at position 20210 is the functionally least efficient nucleotide to support 3¢ end processing but has evolved to be physiologically optimal''.…”
Section: Variants That Have Occurred Within the Lasmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In light of another recent discovery (7) that CFIm68 binds to a number of USE sequences containing UGUAN repeats and promotes polyadenylation and that the SVL poly(A) site contains such repeats, it remains a formal possibility that Hu proteins and CFIm may modulate the polyadenylation activity of sites that contain binding sites for both proteins through their competing activities. Given that USEs have been identified in an increasing number of cellular poly(A) sites (23,(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), it will be of particular interest to further investigate the role of Hu proteins in USE-mediated polyadenylation regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying molecular mechanism of F2 20210*A and F2 20221*T has previously been identified to represent gain‐of‐function of 3′ end mRNA formation as a novel molecular principle, causing gene dysfunction and a hereditary disorder [9–12]. Furthermore, the F2 20210*A mutation may also affect translation efficiency [13] and, more recently, the unusual susceptibility to gain‐of‐function mutations has been explained by a unique architecture of tightly balanced non‐canonical‐positive and ‐negative elements within the F2 3′ end formation signal (see below) [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%