2012
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2012.675139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the shape of a building and its energy performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a significant body of research has been conducted on topics related in BIM-aided collaborative design and the efficient use of BIM technology, there is little known about the incorporation of sustainable performance analysis into these processes. The main approaches of BIM and sustainability assessment integration are either frameworks for the effective use of existing tools collaborative or otherwise), new stand-alone assessment tools or a hybrid approach of creating new tools to assist co-ordination between different software (Barnes and Castro-Lacouture, 2009;Biswas and Krishnamurti, 2009;Schlueter and Thesseling, 2009;Bank et al, 2010;Welle et al, 2011;Geyer, 2012;Parasonis et al, 2012;Gerber et al, 2012;Bazjanac, 2008;Gupta et al, 2014;Howard and Björk, 2008;NBS, 2012). These new tools are either integrated into BIM software or extracting data in open exchange formats (IFC, gbXML, ecoXML) and manipulate them for performing their analysis.…”
Section: Building Performance Simulation Tools and Building Informatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a significant body of research has been conducted on topics related in BIM-aided collaborative design and the efficient use of BIM technology, there is little known about the incorporation of sustainable performance analysis into these processes. The main approaches of BIM and sustainability assessment integration are either frameworks for the effective use of existing tools collaborative or otherwise), new stand-alone assessment tools or a hybrid approach of creating new tools to assist co-ordination between different software (Barnes and Castro-Lacouture, 2009;Biswas and Krishnamurti, 2009;Schlueter and Thesseling, 2009;Bank et al, 2010;Welle et al, 2011;Geyer, 2012;Parasonis et al, 2012;Gerber et al, 2012;Bazjanac, 2008;Gupta et al, 2014;Howard and Björk, 2008;NBS, 2012). These new tools are either integrated into BIM software or extracting data in open exchange formats (IFC, gbXML, ecoXML) and manipulate them for performing their analysis.…”
Section: Building Performance Simulation Tools and Building Informatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the proven benefits of these tools (Schlueter and Thesseling, 2009;Azhar et al, 2008;Azhar, 2011;Stumpf et al, 2009;Geyer, 2012;Çetiner, 2010;Gerber et al, 2012;Mourshed et al, 2003;Parasonis et al, 2012;Ding, 2008;Attia et al, 2009;Brahme et al, 2001), their practice should be utilised with careful consideration of the information requirements and the expected outputs of certain types of analysis. BIM (Building Information Modelling) software addresses this issue by promoting the integration of multi-disciplinary information and presents an opportunity to use accurate inputs to perform performance analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of outer surface area to net floor area (SA/NFA) represents the compactness of the buildings[63,64]. The ratio of perimeter area (interior space under the roof and within 3m from the exterior walls) to net floor area (PA/NFA) indicates susceptibility of a building to outdoor condition (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the existing studies on these three factors are summarized in Tables 1-3. (1) Building geometry: Building energy demand is greatly influenced by a building's composition and shape. Thus, almost all the previous studies related to building geometry evaluated building energy performance by focusing on the surrounding environment (i.e., site slope) and plan form (refer to Table 1) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. For example, De Castro and Gadi (2017) compared the annual energy savings according to the site slope within the range of 0~50 • to find out the ideal design by considering the topography.…”
Section: Part A-1: Passive Sustainable Designmentioning
confidence: 99%