2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf03403684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between the Supply of Fast-food Chains and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Abstract: Objective: To examine the extent to which inter-regional differences in fast-food concentrations account for variations in all-cause mortality and acute coronary syndromes throughout Ontario, Canada.Methods: Nine distinct fast-food chains were selected based on top sales data in 2001. The per capita rate of fast-food outlets per region was calculated for each of 380 regions throughout Ontario. Outcome measures, obtained using 2001 vital statistics data and hospital discharge abstracts, included regional per ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive effect in our study of proximity to some but not all physical activity facilities on health predictors such as BMI has been described19 and could reflect a preference for certain activities including golf or tennis over lawn bowling or swimming reflected as choices of place of residence in the study population. The HSA cohort in our study has been previously described31 as having a more heterogeneous place of residence than the CRF group reflecting choices (or not) in supporting a healthy lifestyle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The positive effect in our study of proximity to some but not all physical activity facilities on health predictors such as BMI has been described19 and could reflect a preference for certain activities including golf or tennis over lawn bowling or swimming reflected as choices of place of residence in the study population. The HSA cohort in our study has been previously described31 as having a more heterogeneous place of residence than the CRF group reflecting choices (or not) in supporting a healthy lifestyle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Because few published studies have linked the disparities in the types of food stores and restaurants with health outcomes, this study aimed to measure the association between neighborhood availability of food stores and cardiovascular health among adults living in the southern region of the United States. Because of these findings from other investigators (Inagami et al, 2006; Morland et al, 2006; Alter and Eny, 2005; Maddock, 2004; Sturm and Datar, 2005), we hypothesized that a higher prevalence of supermarket and a lower prevalence of small grocery stores and fast food restaurants would be associated with a lower prevalence of obesity among adult residents. Moreover, we hypothesized that those individuals living closer to supermarkets, as well as those living further from small grocery stores and fast food restaurants, would have lower BMIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Authors found that adults living in areas with supermarkets had a lower prevalence of obesity compared to adults who lived in census tracts with no supermarkets. Alter and Eny (2005) found the density of fast food restaurants to be associated with cardiovascular events in Canada. In the United States, Maddock (2004) used state-level data to demonstrate a correlation between the density of fast food restaurants and state-level obesity prevalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…14 Moreover, contrary to expectations, this study found an elevated risk of being overweight among individuals living farther away from multinational fast-food outlets as compared with those living closer. A Canadian study reported a positive association of regional fast-food concentration with rates of acute coronary hospitalisation in Ontario, 15 whereas a Swedish study found no significant association between community availability of fast-food restaurants and individual-level coronary heart disease risk. 16 Therefore, findings from the USA and other high-income countries are inconsistent and unlikely to be generalisable to other settings where obesity is on the rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%