“…Slides were histopathologically analysed for (i) TILs (defined as the mean percentage of stroma of invasive carcinoma infiltrated by lymphocytes and plasma cells in 10% increments; if <10% of stroma was infiltrated by TILs, 1% or 5% criteria were used; all available full sections were evaluated);1 19 (ii) the amount of inflammatory cells evaluated at the tumour's invasive margin (according to Klintrup criteria; score 0, no inflammatory cells at the invasive margin; score 1, mild and patchy increase of inflammatory cells; score 2, increased inflammatory cells forming a band-like infiltration at the invasive margin; score 3, prominent inflammatory reaction forming a cup-like zone at the invasive margin);6 20 (iii) aggregation of lymphoid cells in terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs; within 5 mm and >5 mm from the invasive or in situ carcinoma); (iv) the amount of TLSs in adjacent tissue including the in situ component (none, no TLS formation in the area adjacent to the tumour; little, TLSs occupying an area of <10% of the circumference of the tumour; moderate, 10–50%; or abundant, >50%; shown in figure 1); (v) the presence or absence of a germinal centre in TLSs; (vi) the percentage of tumour stroma in the most invasive tumour area (high percentage of tumour stroma, >50%; low percentage of tumour stroma, ≤50%);16 (vii) heterogeneity of the tumour (heterogeneous: invasive tumour mixed with normal breast parenchyma; homogeneous: invasive tumour mass without normal breast parenchyma); (viii) histological subtype and grade, percentage of in situ component, tumour size, pT stage, pN stage and lymphovascular invasion. Lymphoid aggregation with vessels showing HEV features (plump, cuboidal endothelial cells) with or without germinal centres was considered a TLS.…”