2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between using Multiple-Choice Test-Taking Strategies and General Language Proficiency Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can use test-strategies in many test formats but the primary use of it is in multiple-choice questions (Ghafournia, 2013) and (Haladyna, 2004). So, knowing this points leads teachers attention to the importance of strategies and flaws that might happen in their tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can use test-strategies in many test formats but the primary use of it is in multiple-choice questions (Ghafournia, 2013) and (Haladyna, 2004). So, knowing this points leads teachers attention to the importance of strategies and flaws that might happen in their tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular type of objective tests is Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) (Farhady, Ja'farpur, & Birjandi, 2007). MCQs are today very popular and use in different aspects of language learning and this popularity has some reasons; high reliability, convenience in scoring, efficiency, and economy (Ghafournia, 2013). As each MCQ seems consisted of a few lines, many teachers believe they are easy to construct but they are actually very difficult to design correctly (Brown & Abeywickrama, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the individual skills are concerned, some studies deal with tests which include various skills or general proficiency tests e.g. Ghafournia (2013), Xiao (2014), Zhang, Liu, Zhao, & Xie (2011); nevertheless, studies concentrating solely on reading, e.g. Kashkouli & Barati (2012), Ghafournia & Afghari (2013), Guo, Suk, Kim, Zang & Liu (2016), Wu & Stone (2006) or Cohen & Upton (2007) significantly outnumber those concentrating on listening (Winke &Lim, 2017, andLiu, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with Cohen and Upton's division, they include test-wiseness, test management as well as some reading strategies in their research under test-taking strategies. Ghafournia (2013) claims that "due to the interrelated nature of learning and test-taking strategies should be investigated interactively" (p. 91); nevertheless, her research only deals with test-taking strategies. Allan (1992) says that "reading test-taking strategies abstracted from examinees selfreports reflect not only 'pure' reading strategies but also test-taking strategies which have little to do with reading skill" (p. 101).…”
Section: Findings Delimiting the Scope Of Strategies Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation