1984
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1984.45.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of beliefs about controlled drinking to recidivism in alcoholic men.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These numbers are, nonetheless, consistent with attrition rates upwards of 25% of treatment-seekers reported in the AUD literature (e.g., Epstein et al, 1994; Kranzler et al, 1996; Ojehagen and Berglund, 1992); further, the percentage of AUD individuals that remain sober versus those who relapse is low (Noda et al, 2001; Pagano et al, 2004; Watson et al, 1984; Yates et al, 1994). Despite the small sample size, the current findings are supported by the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These numbers are, nonetheless, consistent with attrition rates upwards of 25% of treatment-seekers reported in the AUD literature (e.g., Epstein et al, 1994; Kranzler et al, 1996; Ojehagen and Berglund, 1992); further, the percentage of AUD individuals that remain sober versus those who relapse is low (Noda et al, 2001; Pagano et al, 2004; Watson et al, 1984; Yates et al, 1994). Despite the small sample size, the current findings are supported by the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, the results suggest that the outcomes for alcoholics who indulge in controlled drinking without special training may be neither worse nor better than those of alcoholics who do not. These findings complement an earlier study (Watson, Jacobs, Pucel, Tilleskjor, & Hoodecheck-Schow, 1984), in which we reported that alcoholics' beliefs about the importance of abstinence did not relate to their prognoses. These findings should be interpreted with some caution for several reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The validity of a modified form of this scale has been discussed elsewhere (Watson, 1985). Collaterals' ratings rather than self-reports were used because the validity of alcoholics' selfdescriptions of their drinking is questionable (e.g., Polich et al, 1981;Watson, 1985;Watson, Tilleskjor, Hoodecheck-Schow, Pucel, & Jacobs, 1984).' The collaterals were wives (31%), parents (13070), other relatives (14%), friends 19Oi'o), employers (~V O ) , and institutional staff members (16%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some use any drinking behavior as an indicator of relapse (e.g., Burling, Reilly, Moltzen, & Ziff, 1989;Sussman, Rychtarik, Mueser, Glynn, & Prue, 1986); some use readmittance to a drug treatment center (e.g., Kivlahan, Walker, Donovan, & Mischke, 1985); some use drivers' history files and arrest blood alcohol content forms (e.g., Wells-Parker, Pang, Anderson, McMillen, & Miller, 1991); and still others use more subjective family reports (Watson, Jacobs, Pucel, Tilleskjor, & Hoodecheck, 1984). Some use any drinking behavior as an indicator of relapse (e.g., Burling, Reilly, Moltzen, & Ziff, 1989;Sussman, Rychtarik, Mueser, Glynn, & Prue, 1986); some use readmittance to a drug treatment center (e.g., Kivlahan, Walker, Donovan, & Mischke, 1985); some use drivers' history files and arrest blood alcohol content forms (e.g., Wells-Parker, Pang, Anderson, McMillen, & Miller, 1991); and still others use more subjective family reports (Watson, Jacobs, Pucel, Tilleskjor, & Hoodecheck, 1984).…”
Section: Chemical Dependency Relapsesmentioning
confidence: 99%