1965
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0441555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Egg Shape to Shell Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
3

Year Published

1969
1969
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Very low or no correlation between shape index and shell deformation has been reported by various authors (Richards and Swanson, 1965;Masic et al, 1966;Tung et al, 1968). These results were obtained after either determining the correlation between the properties of individual eggs from a group sample or that between the average properties of the individual hens.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Very low or no correlation between shape index and shell deformation has been reported by various authors (Richards and Swanson, 1965;Masic et al, 1966;Tung et al, 1968). These results were obtained after either determining the correlation between the properties of individual eggs from a group sample or that between the average properties of the individual hens.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…The role of egg shape in shell strength, as pointed out by Richards and Swanson (1965), has received only limited consideration. Although the curvature of the shell (caused by variation in the egg shape) may influence its strength, Richards and Swanson (1965) concluded that breaking strength did not depend to any appreciable degree upon egg shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the latter are considered the most important ones in uencing the strength of the eggshell, they only account at best for 56% of the observed differences in strength (Richards and Swanson, 1965). This fact is explained by other authors (Voisey and Hunt, 1967;Carter, 1970;Bain, 1990) as a result of the in uence of other structural variables such as egg size and shell curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…After weighing, length and width of each egg were measured for egg shape index calculation (width/length × 100). Specific gravity was determined by the method of Richards and Swanson (1965) using the weight of the egg in air and in water and the formula: dry weight/(dry -wet weight). The weights of yolk, albumen, and shell were used for calculation of their proportions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%