Background: Older people are placed in different body positions for medical, nursing and physiotherapy intervention.Objective: To investigate the effect of body position on cardio-respiratory variables in active older people.Design: Experimental laboratory study.Setting: Research was undertaken at the James Cook University, Physiotherapy Clinic.Subjects: Twenty-six active people aged 60 years and over.Methods: Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation were measured every two minutes over a ten minute period in five standardized positions, sitting, right side lying, left side lying, supine and supine with the head 20 degrees below the level of the body. Rate pressure product and mean arterial pressure were calculated. Smoking history, medication use, health conditions and activity level were recorded. Height, weight and body fat were measured.Results: Left and right side lying produced significantly lower diastolic and systolic blood pressure, rate pressure product and mean arterial pressure than supine with the head down. Older, healthy people have decreased forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume after one second in side lying when compared to sitting [16]. Further healthy, seated older subjects 3 (>65 years) have significant impairment of ventilation distribution to dependent lung zones [17].
Body position and cardio-respiratory variables in older peopleOlder people exhibit significant increased preference for the right side sleep position [18]. This has been postulated to be due to age related alterations in cardiovascular function [18] or compression from other structures causing reduction in ventricular distensibility [19].This study investigates the effect of five standardised body positions on cardio-respiratory variables in a group of healthy, older people. Comparisons are made to previously reported findings for young and middle aged healthy people.
MethodologyThe method of this observational study largely replicates Jones & Dean [4]. It is described here for the convenience of the reader and to identify alterations for this study.Participants were recruited from four Probus clubs (a community organisation for people aged over 60 years) in Townsville, Australia. Human research ethics approval was provided by James Cook University and signed informed consent was gained prior to participation.Participants were eligible to participate if they were over 60 years of age. A screening questionnaire (see Appendix 1 in the supplementary data on the journal website) was completed by participants to identify the presence of any physical or medical condition which would prevent participants from comfortably adopting each position included in the study for 20 minutes.Information regarding smoking history, usual exercise level, medication use, medical history and recent illness was also collected.