1962
DOI: 10.1515/hfsg.1962.16.2.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Structure to Transverse Anisotropy in Wood with Reference to Shrinkage and Elasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transverse anisotropy of cell wall material is, though related, not a phenomenon identical to the swelling anisotropy of cell tissue and wood at timber scale [11]. The swelling/ shrinkage coefficient is defined as the strain induced by a variation of 1% MC and is calculated from the slope of the strain curve plotted against MC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transverse anisotropy of cell wall material is, though related, not a phenomenon identical to the swelling anisotropy of cell tissue and wood at timber scale [11]. The swelling/ shrinkage coefficient is defined as the strain induced by a variation of 1% MC and is calculated from the slope of the strain curve plotted against MC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the mechanical properties change within the annual growth rings. Earlywood exhibits a marked anisotropic behavior (with large thin-walled cells aligned in the radial direction), while latewood exhibits a roughly isotropic behavior (with smaller and thicker-walled cells) (Boutelje 1962). Therefore, the proportion between earlywood and latewood affects the relationship between the radial-tangential moduli.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the broad-rayed wood species, such as oak and beech, shrinkage results may support the hypothesis that rays are one of the factors responsible for transverse shrinkage anisotropy, because the ray volume is up to 17% -22% of the wood tissue in oak and beech ( Skaar 1988 ). However, Boutelje (1962) denied the importance of rays with this regard in softwood species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the R direction, both the EW and LW shrink independently, that is, they act in series and the total R shrinkage is the weighted mean shrinkage of the LW and EW ( Spear and Walker 2006 ). Pentoney (1953) and Boutelje (1962) tried to evaluate the influence of the M ö rath theory on the differential shrinkage. Kifetew et al (1997) suggested a relationship for calculating the gross T and R shrinkage of Scots pine based on the isolated EW and LW interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%