1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(76)91108-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of the cochlear microphonic potential to the acquisition of a classically conditioned pupillary dilation response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDS (US) produced consistently large dilation responses throughout the experimental session. During conditioning, acoustically evoked dilations increased rapidly over trials, as has been reported previously (Ashe et al, 1976;Oleson et al, 1972Oleson et al, , 1973Oleson et al, , 1975Ryugo & Weinberger, 1978;Weinberger, Oleson, & Haste, 1973). The average conditioned dilations typically exceeded the largest acoustically elicited responses of the preceding sensitization period during Trials 6-10, attained asymptote by Trials 21-25, and maintained high values thereafter ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Pupillary Behavior and Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EDS (US) produced consistently large dilation responses throughout the experimental session. During conditioning, acoustically evoked dilations increased rapidly over trials, as has been reported previously (Ashe et al, 1976;Oleson et al, 1972Oleson et al, , 1973Oleson et al, , 1975Ryugo & Weinberger, 1978;Weinberger, Oleson, & Haste, 1973). The average conditioned dilations typically exceeded the largest acoustically elicited responses of the preceding sensitization period during Trials 6-10, attained asymptote by Trials 21-25, and maintained high values thereafter ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Pupillary Behavior and Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The effects of training on pupillary behavior were assessed as described previously (Ashe, Cassady, & Weinberger, 1976;Oleson et al, 1975;, Oleson, Vododnick, & Weinberger, 1973;Oleson, Westenberg, & Weinberger, 1972;Ryugo & Weinberger, 1978). Briefly, the pupillometer write-out was measured immediately preceding the presentation of the CS throughout training and preceding the US for sensitization trials on which EDS was given alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include inhibition of delay , conditioned inhibition , discrimination between two acoustic stimuli (Ryugo and Weinberger, 19781, retention of discrimination over days, and discrimination reversal (Oleson et al, 1972. Furthermore, these normal behavioral phenomena develop while the cochlear microphonic is constant, demonstrating acoustic control (Ashe et al, 1976). Finally, pupillary learning in this preparation is accompanied by the systematic development of discharge plasticity of single neurons in auditory cortex Weinberger et al, 1984).…”
Section: Subjects Surgery and Preparation For Recordingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The animals were artificially ventilated; expired carbon dioxide levels were maintained within normal limits and were continuously monitored with a Beckman Gas Analyzer. Neuromuscular blockade which insured stimulus constancy at the periphery (Ashe et al, 1976;Baust and Berlucchi, 1964;Carmel and Starr, 1963;Irvine and Webster, 1972) was maintained with Flaxedil (15 mghr, iv). The corneas were coated with ophthalmic ointment to preclude possible discomfort from drying, the subject was positioned on cushions, and the pedestal was bolted to a rigid attachment to the stereotaxic frame.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%