2016
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships among bovine αS-casein phosphorylation isoforms suggest different phosphorylation pathways

Abstract: Casein (CN) phosphorylation is an important posttranslational modification and is one of the key factors responsible for constructing and stabilizing casein micelles. Variation in phosphorylation degree of αS-CN is of great interest because it is suggested to affect milk technological properties. This study aimed to investigate the variation in phosphorylation degree of αS-CN among milk of individual cows and to explore relationships among different phosphorylation isoforms of αS-CN. For this purpose, we analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 80 ] and Fang et al . [ 81 ], who suggest from phenotypic correlations and hierarchical clustering the existence of at least 2 regulatory systems for phosphorylation of α s -CN. Elsewhere, bovine milk osteopontin which is a multiphosphorylated glycoprotein also found in bone, was shown to contain 27 SerP and one ThrP [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 80 ] and Fang et al . [ 81 ], who suggest from phenotypic correlations and hierarchical clustering the existence of at least 2 regulatory systems for phosphorylation of α s -CN. Elsewhere, bovine milk osteopontin which is a multiphosphorylated glycoprotein also found in bone, was shown to contain 27 SerP and one ThrP [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, herd and dairy vat milks were obtained from dairy farms that varied in geographical location, calving season, average annual herd protein content of the previous milking campaign, and herd size; samples were collected in February to March 2015 and May to June 2015. Individual milk samples were collected between January and June 2016 from cows at different stages of lactation, which represented a wide range of lactoprotein phenotypes (Fang et al, 2016). Of the 250 individual milk samples that were retained, 98 came from the morning milking, 99 came from the evening milking, and 53 were a mixture of 2 successive milkings in relative proportions.…”
Section: Reference Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les laits de mélange (tanks + cuves) ont été collectés en février-mars et mai-juin 2015 (deux saisons de vêlage) dans 100 troupeaux de tailles différentes, répartis sur toute la région et présentant des taux protéiques annuels variés lors de la campagne précédente. L'échantillonnage des laits individuels a été réalisé entre janvier et juin 2016 sur des vaches à différents stades de lactation qui présentaient une large variété de génotypes aux lactoprotéines (Fang et al, 2016) et avec moins de 10 6 cellules somatiques par mL et 10 5 UFC/mL. Sur les 250 échantillons de lait individuels recueillis, 99 provenaient de la traite du matin, 98 de la traite du soir et 53 étaient un mélange de laits prélevés en proportions relatives à la traite du matin et du soir.…”
Section: Population De Calibration : éChantillonnage Et Analyses De Runclassified