1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1996.d01-450.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships among three habitat scales and stream benthic invertebrate community structure

Abstract: 1. The relationships between three habitat scales and lotic invertebrate species composition were investigated for the 15 540 km2 Yakima River basin in south‐central Washington, U.S.A. 2. The three spatial scales were sample (the sampled riffle), reach (a length of ten–twenty stream widths) and segment (a length of stream of nearly uniform slope and valley form having no change in stream order). 3. Physical variables were highly correlated between scales and expressed a relationship between altitude, basin for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This distribution of species correlated with environmental variability and not the order of the rivers (CARTER et al, 1996). The same pattern was found for Boyero (2003), in two basins in central region of Spain, and Donald & Anderson (1977), in Canada, where the richness varied considerably among microbasins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This distribution of species correlated with environmental variability and not the order of the rivers (CARTER et al, 1996). The same pattern was found for Boyero (2003), in two basins in central region of Spain, and Donald & Anderson (1977), in Canada, where the richness varied considerably among microbasins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Although all variables in multiple scales influence the prediction of aquatic assemblages, their relative contributions are different (Carter et al, 1996;Townsend, 2003). Assemblage-specific responses to different types, levels, or scales of disturbance can result in low intercorrelation between diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and fish metrics (Flinders et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach was taken but only a 91 m radius was used for this analysis. We realize that stream ecosystems are continuous and that conditions at a particular site on a stream reflect the cumulative inputs upstream in the watershed, however studies have also shown that local environmental conditions have a strong influence on biological assemblages (Carter et al, 1996;Pan et al, 1996;Richards et al, 1997).…”
Section: Near-stream Land Use Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%