2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9060843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationships between Process Parameters and Polymeric Nanofibers Fabricated Using a Modified Coaxial Electrospinning

Abstract: The concrete relationship between the process parameters and nanoproduct properties is an important challenge for applying nanotechnology to produce functional nanomaterials. In this study, the relationships between series of process parameters and the medicated nanofibers’ diameter were investigated. With an electrospinnable solution of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and ketoprofen as the core fluid, four kinds of nanofibers were prepared with ethanol as a sheath fluid and under the variable applied vol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters have a positive impact on downsizing of the nanobers. [14][15][16][17][18] Despite important experimental investigations to determine ber diameter, using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy for example, it is still time-consuming and expensive. 18,19 Furthermore, complexities in the electrospinning method and many factors simultaneously affecting the preparation techniques cause the ndings from statistical tools, such as response surface methodology and regression analysis, to be very noisy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters have a positive impact on downsizing of the nanobers. [14][15][16][17][18] Despite important experimental investigations to determine ber diameter, using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy for example, it is still time-consuming and expensive. 18,19 Furthermore, complexities in the electrospinning method and many factors simultaneously affecting the preparation techniques cause the ndings from statistical tools, such as response surface methodology and regression analysis, to be very noisy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Furthermore, complexities in the electrospinning method and many factors simultaneously affecting the preparation techniques cause the ndings from statistical tools, such as response surface methodology and regression analysis, to be very noisy. 16,20 Regression analysis is one of the traditional techniques that has been used for model generation but the accuracy decreases when the independent parameters increase. In complex phenomena modeling, methods such as an articial neural network (ANN) are employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connected voltage is also one of the key elements in electrospinning 57,67 . A high applied voltage (>40 kV) is normally required to initiate the upward needleless electrospinning fiber production.…”
Section: Effect Of Experimental Parameters On Pmes the Electrospinnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional coaxial electrospinning can only directly create solid core-shell structures, although which can be utilized to further prepare nanotubes and other derivatives [29]. In sharp contrast, the modified coaxial electrospinning can be exploited for producing core-shell structures, just as the traditional ones [30], but also can be utilized to prepare nanocoating on the core polymeric fibers [31]. What is more, when solvents are explored as the sheath working fluids, modified coaxial electrospinning can be utilized to stabilize the working process [32], keep the working processes from clogging, manipulate the nanofibers' diameter without the additions of salt or other additives, and systematically improve the nanofibers' quality.…”
Section: The Nanostructures Created By the Modified Coaxial Electrospmentioning
confidence: 99%