2011
DOI: 10.1002/hup.1228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships of ‘ecstasy’ (MDMA) and cannabis use to impaired executive inhibition and access to semantic long‐term memory

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the relationship between the consumption of ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)) and cannabis, and performance on the random letter generation task which generates dependent variables drawing upon executive inhibition and access to semantic long-term memory (LTM). The participant group was a between-participant independent variable with users of both ecstasy and cannabis (E/C group, n = 15), users of cannabis but not ecstasy (CA group, n = 13) and controls with no expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is not invariably the case, as some studies report intact immediate (Chang et al 2006; Gruber et al 2011; Wadsworth et al 2006) and delayed recall (Chang et al 2006; Gruber et al 2011) among cannabis users. Other evidence suggests that recall performance is negatively associated with amount of past year (Jager et al 2007) and lifetime cannabis use (Indlekofer et al 2009; Jager et al 2007; P. Murphy et al 2011; Solowij et al 2011), duration of cannabis use (Solowij et al 2011; Wadsworth et al 2006), frequency of cannabis use, and age of first cannabis use (Solowij et al 2011).…”
Section: Non-acute Effects Of Cannabis On Neurocognitive Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is not invariably the case, as some studies report intact immediate (Chang et al 2006; Gruber et al 2011; Wadsworth et al 2006) and delayed recall (Chang et al 2006; Gruber et al 2011) among cannabis users. Other evidence suggests that recall performance is negatively associated with amount of past year (Jager et al 2007) and lifetime cannabis use (Indlekofer et al 2009; Jager et al 2007; P. Murphy et al 2011; Solowij et al 2011), duration of cannabis use (Solowij et al 2011; Wadsworth et al 2006), frequency of cannabis use, and age of first cannabis use (Solowij et al 2011).…”
Section: Non-acute Effects Of Cannabis On Neurocognitive Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental health disorders are associated with particular patterns of interactions [27] and communication [28] online. This analysis may also provide a means to describe diseases by making their current textual descriptions computable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory control, the ability to inhibit an automatic/dominant response when it is not appropriate does not appear to be affected by ecstasy use using a range of paradigms. Studies using the Stroop task (Back-Madruga et al, 2003;Croft et al, 2001;Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al, 2000;Halpern et al, 2011;Morgan et al, 2002;Wagner et al, 2012), Random Letter Generation (Fisk et al, 2004;Fisk & Montgomery 2009;Montgomery et al, 2005;Murphy et al, 2011), and Go/NoGo paradigms (Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al, 2003;Hanson & Luciana, 2010;Roberts & Garavan, 2010) do not report ecstasy-group differences relative to controls. When investigating task switching, the ability to switch attention back and forth between different tasks/aspects pf the same task, there is limited evidence for performance decrements related to ecstasy use.…”
Section: Long Term Cognitive Deficits In Recreational Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%