1995
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.1995.10.3.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships of motor function, education, age and cognitive function to the physical activities of daily living

Abstract: The physical activities of daily living are a final outcome of many functions and dependent on many factors. This study was aimed at exploring the relationships of motor function, dementia, education, age, and cognitive function to the physical activities of daily living in 67 elderly people residing in an institution in Taegu, Korea. Their mean ( +/- SD) age was 75.6 +/- 8.1 and 24 (35.8%) were men. Twenty-eight (41.8%) were classified as having definite cognitive impairment, 17 (25.4%) as having questionable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is advantageous in that it allows for long-term evaluation, of which the MMSE is unable to perform (Brickman et al, 2002). The BDRS comes in both full and modified form, where the full test assesses for everyday activities, habits, personality, interest, and drive, whereas the modified version simply tests for everyday activities and habits (Park, Jung, & Lim, 1995). The BDRS yielded 96% sensitivity and 82% specificity in distinguishing subjects with dementia among a sample of 291 older adults (Heun, Papassotiropoulos, & Jennssen, 1998).…”
Section: Visuospatialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is advantageous in that it allows for long-term evaluation, of which the MMSE is unable to perform (Brickman et al, 2002). The BDRS comes in both full and modified form, where the full test assesses for everyday activities, habits, personality, interest, and drive, whereas the modified version simply tests for everyday activities and habits (Park, Jung, & Lim, 1995). The BDRS yielded 96% sensitivity and 82% specificity in distinguishing subjects with dementia among a sample of 291 older adults (Heun, Papassotiropoulos, & Jennssen, 1998).…”
Section: Visuospatialmentioning
confidence: 99%