1998
DOI: 10.1080/00138389808599139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative/conjunction interface: A study of the syntax ofwhile/whilstin present‐day English∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that relative adverbs are sensitive to those refined semantic differences, the contrast between those adverbs and relative that becomes even bigger. For a comprehensive study of relative while see Trotta and Seppänen 1998. controversial as its current syntactic status. Some scholars trace it back to the Old English pronoun þaet; others view it as going back to the subordinating conjunction þaet.…”
Section: Diachronic Excursus: On the History Of Relative Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that relative adverbs are sensitive to those refined semantic differences, the contrast between those adverbs and relative that becomes even bigger. For a comprehensive study of relative while see Trotta and Seppänen 1998. controversial as its current syntactic status. Some scholars trace it back to the Old English pronoun þaet; others view it as going back to the subordinating conjunction þaet.…”
Section: Diachronic Excursus: On the History Of Relative Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the descriptive grammar by Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik (henceforth Quirk et al) that is treated as a relative pronoun (1985:366). Seppänen and Kjellmer (1995:396), Trotta and Seppänen (1998), and most explicitly Seppänen (1993; reject the complementiser analysis in favour of the pronoun analysis. Kim and Sells (2008), too, treat that as a relative pronoun in their very recent introduction to English syntax mainly based on the feature structure system of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.…”
Section: Introduction and Survey Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the descriptive grammar by Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik (henceforth Quirk et al) that is treated as a relative pronoun (1985:366). Seppänen and Kjellmer (1995:396), Trotta and Seppänen (1998), and most explicitly Seppänen (1993;2000) reject the complementiser analysis in favour of the pronoun analysis. Kim and Sells (2008), too, treat that as a relative pronoun in their very recent introduction to English syntax mainly based on the feature structure system of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%