2013
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative contribution of methanotrophs to microbial communities and carbon cycling in soil overlying a coal-bed methane seep

Abstract: Seepage of coal-bed methane (CBM) through soils is a potential source of atmospheric CH4 and also a likely source of ancient (i.e. (14) C-dead) carbon to soil microbial communities. Natural abundance (13) C and (14) C compositions of bacterial membrane phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) and soil gas CO2 and CH4 were used to assess the incorporation of CBM-derived carbon into methanotrophs and other members of the soil microbial community. Concentrations of type I and type II methanotroph PLFA biomarkers (16:1ω8c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(175 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general assumption in most soil flux studies is that only biological communities near the soil surface are responsible for the observed CO 2 . This is of course a simplification, and CO 2 in the soil profile may originate from a variety of sources, including soil pedogenic or liquid water carbonates (Cerling et al 1991;Serrano-Ortiz et al 2010;Shanhun et al 2012;Risk et al 2013b), methane oxidation (Romanak et al 2012;Mills et al 2013), or volcanic activity (Werner and Brantley 2003;Viveiros et al 2008;Beulig et al 2016). Soil sinks for CO 2 may also exist, for example from carbonate dissolution (Shanhun et al 2012) and C-fixation by chemoautotrophic microbes (Beulig et al 2016).…”
Section: Challenge 2: Beyond Autotrophic and Heterotrophic Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general assumption in most soil flux studies is that only biological communities near the soil surface are responsible for the observed CO 2 . This is of course a simplification, and CO 2 in the soil profile may originate from a variety of sources, including soil pedogenic or liquid water carbonates (Cerling et al 1991;Serrano-Ortiz et al 2010;Shanhun et al 2012;Risk et al 2013b), methane oxidation (Romanak et al 2012;Mills et al 2013), or volcanic activity (Werner and Brantley 2003;Viveiros et al 2008;Beulig et al 2016). Soil sinks for CO 2 may also exist, for example from carbonate dissolution (Shanhun et al 2012) and C-fixation by chemoautotrophic microbes (Beulig et al 2016).…”
Section: Challenge 2: Beyond Autotrophic and Heterotrophic Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e) PCA scores for PLFA biomarkers. Means ± one SE (n = 5) methanotrophs, and C18:1ω7c and C18:1ω8c for type II methanotrophs (Maxfield et al 2006;Mills et al 2013;Roslev and Iversen 1999;Singh et al 2007). Both C16:1ω5 and C18:1ω7c were detected in both C. panamensis and R. taedigera peats in this study and were the most abundant Gram negative biomarkers, accounting for approximately 73% (21.2 μg g −1 ) of total Gram negative PLFA abundance (Fig.…”
Section: Peat Botanical Origin and Microbial Community Structurementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Soil CH 4 flux can be highly variable because methane microbial production and consumption can simultaneously occur in the soil within different microsites. CH 4 is generally consumed in aerated soil, such as upland soils, when methanotrophic bacteria oxidize CH 4 to CO 2 while concurrently assimilating a large proportion of CH 4 ‐C, often as much as half or more, into microbial biomass C (Mills et al, 2013). Conversely methanogenesis is an anaerobic process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%