1996
DOI: 10.1080/08824099609362090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative effects of content and vocal delivery during a simulated employment interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the structure of servers' verbal delivery of hospitable cues (e.g., pitch and volume variation) (cf. Mino 1996) or even the posture of their heads (tilted vs. upright) (Otta et al 1994) might systemically vary by customers' race in ways not assessed in this study that could produce perceived differences in sincerity/ authenticity. Researchers advancing this line of inquiry should also be sensitive to potential interracial differences in the motivations underlying subtle forms of discriminatory behaviors among black and white servers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the structure of servers' verbal delivery of hospitable cues (e.g., pitch and volume variation) (cf. Mino 1996) or even the posture of their heads (tilted vs. upright) (Otta et al 1994) might systemically vary by customers' race in ways not assessed in this study that could produce perceived differences in sincerity/ authenticity. Researchers advancing this line of inquiry should also be sensitive to potential interracial differences in the motivations underlying subtle forms of discriminatory behaviors among black and white servers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the structure of servers' verbal delivery of hospitable cues (e.g., pitch and volume variation) (cf. Mino ) or even the posture of their heads (tilted vs. upright) (Otta et al. ) might systemically vary by customers' race in ways not assessed in this study that could produce perceived differences in sincerity/authenticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%