The relative efficiency analysis of innovation activities with uncertainty: The case of Korean electronic equipment industry

Moon, Hye-Seon

doi:10.5172/impp.2013.15.3.305

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Innovation performance analysis of general innovation activities mainly focuses on a few selected input indicators such as R&D employees and R&D expenditure, and output indicators such as number of patents and turnover of new products (Cruz-Cázares et al, 2013;Lee and Yoon, 2015;Kaihua and Mingting, 2014;Moon, 2013). These selected input and output indicators seem adequate for general innovation performance evaluation.…”

Section: Two-stage Method: Dea-tobitmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation performance and influencing factors of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of Chinese manufacturing industry

Huang

Wang

2016

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

149

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Two-stage Method: Dea-tobitmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation performance and influencing factors of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of Chinese manufacturing industry

Huang

Wang

2016

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

149

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This work addresses the gap identified in the literature (Oliveira et al, 2018;Ruži c & Benazi c, 2021;Santos et al, 2018) of a lack of robust analysis of CSFs for innovativeness. Although other partial studies on CSF have been published (Chen et al, 2016;Moon, 2013;Peng et al, 2019), no previous work involving the study of a group of 16 CSFs as analyzed in this paper has been identified. Another difficulty is in measuring the degree of innovativeness of organizations.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical success factors for the innovativeness of the electronic industry: An analysis in developed and developing countries

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of critical success factors (CSFs) on the innovativeness of the electronic industry. We propose a novel conceptual model. To validate the model, we used structural equation modelling. Data were collected in a survey with 261 responses from companies in Brazil, Canada and the USA. A multigroup analysis was carried out. The results for the whole sample show that all the CSF investigated have a positive and significant influence at 1% on innovativeness, with the greatest influence obtained by the construct innovative culture and strategy, followed by research and development infrastructure, management knowledge and the innovative environment. The originality lies (1) in a proposition of a novel theoretical model that investigates both the individual effect and joint action of the constructs related to CSF, in a broader set of CSF; (2) in a deeper analysis of the relationship between innovativeness with the innovation performance of organizations in the electronic industry; (3) in a different dimension of analysis comparison considering three different innovation systems; and (4) in a managerial contribution by encouraging the construction of an organizational culture that has as its values the constant search for innovation and for encouraging the creation of innovative solutions.

show abstract

“…On the other hand, the top 10 arms importer countries perform about 51.4% of total imports. When the literature is examined, it is seen that despite lots of studies on the manufacturing industry (Mok et al, 2007;Lai, 2007;Nandy, 2011;Memon and Tahir, 2011;Yang et al, 2012;Prusa, 2012;Docekalova and Bockova, 2013;Moon, 2013;Elshamy, 2013;Changjun and Qiaoyue, 2014;Bakırcı et al, 2014;Tatlı and Bayrak, 2016), the number of efficiency studies on the defense industry is limited. Bakırcı et al (2016) analyzed the defense industry of the countries that have the largest 100 defense companies in the world by using MTFP.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

NATO ve EURO Bölgesindeki Savunma Sanayilerinin İktisadi Etkinliği ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği

Bayrak

2020

Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main purpose of this study is to analyze the efficiency and total factor productivity (MTFP) of the 12 defense industries in NATO and the EUROZONE with the data of the 2013-2017 period. GDP, defense expenditures, import for the defense industry and logistics performance index were used as input variables; while total sales and export values of defense industry were used as output variables in accordance with the data acquired from World Bank (WB) and SIPRI. Static DEA and MTFP were applied to data. According to findings of the CCR models; the USA, UK, France, Germany, Spain, and Netherland were observed as efficient DMUs in all years; whereas the other six countries were inefficient ones. Additionally, according to BCC model, only Turkey and Canada were observed as inefficient ones for five years. MTFP analysis revealed that Turkey and Germany were the two countries experiencing TFP in all periods.

show abstract

The relative efficiency analysis of innovation activities with uncertainty: The case of Korean electronic equipment industry

Cited by 9 publications

References 3 publications

Innovation performance and influencing factors of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of Chinese manufacturing industry

Innovation performance and influencing factors of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of Chinese manufacturing industry

Critical success factors for the innovativeness of the electronic industry: An analysis in developed and developing countries

NATO ve EURO Bölgesindeki Savunma Sanayilerinin İktisadi Etkinliği ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About