1963
DOI: 10.2307/2294113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Employment and Income of American Negroes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1968
1968

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occupational status has been analyzed in detail (Chalmers & Dorsey, 1962;Gibbs, 1965;Glenn, 1962Glenn, , 1963aGlenn, , 1963bGlenn, , 1964Guernsey, 1964), with a conclusion that not only does the Negro have a considerably inferior status, but his relative position did not improve from 19 SO to 1960. The same conclusion can be drawn regarding unemployment and income (Amos & Perry, 1963;Daniel, 1963). The number of substandard homes owned by nonwhites fell 20% from 1950 to 1960, whereas there was a decrease of S3 % in the number of substandard homes owned by whites (Yarrow & Sunderhauf, 1963).…”
Section: Family Organizationmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Occupational status has been analyzed in detail (Chalmers & Dorsey, 1962;Gibbs, 1965;Glenn, 1962Glenn, , 1963aGlenn, , 1963bGlenn, , 1964Guernsey, 1964), with a conclusion that not only does the Negro have a considerably inferior status, but his relative position did not improve from 19 SO to 1960. The same conclusion can be drawn regarding unemployment and income (Amos & Perry, 1963;Daniel, 1963). The number of substandard homes owned by nonwhites fell 20% from 1950 to 1960, whereas there was a decrease of S3 % in the number of substandard homes owned by whites (Yarrow & Sunderhauf, 1963).…”
Section: Family Organizationmentioning
confidence: 66%