1985
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.1985.289380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Importance of Aerosol Scattering and Absorption in Remote Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
152
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the constants and NDVI coefficients differed (F test) at the 0.95 level of significance. These differences can be attributed to measurement error and probable differences in atmospheric conditions and understory ground cover at the time of image acquisition (Fraser and Kaufman, 1985;Curran and Williamson, 1987;Spanner et al, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the constants and NDVI coefficients differed (F test) at the 0.95 level of significance. These differences can be attributed to measurement error and probable differences in atmospheric conditions and understory ground cover at the time of image acquisition (Fraser and Kaufman, 1985;Curran and Williamson, 1987;Spanner et al, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerosol SSA (i.e. ratio between scattering and extinction of light) is the optical property that determines the sign of TOA forcing (Lio and Seinfeld, 1998), depending on a critical surface albedo (R s,c ) (Fraser and Kaufman, 1985). As an example, for a SSA of 0.90, R s,c is around 0.3.…”
Section: Radiative Effect Parametrization and Dust Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between NDVI and LAI appear similar for the three dates, but both the constants and the NDVI coefficients differed from each other at the 0.95 level of significance (F test). These differences can be attributed to measurement error and probable differences in atmospheric conditions and understory ground cover at the time of image acquisition (Fraser and Kaufman 1985, Curran and Williamson 1987, Spanner et al 1990). Using data from half of the plots (1 to 8), three predictive relationships (Table 5) were derived to estimate the LAI of the other plots (9 to 16), and the results were compared over all three dates (Fig.…”
Section: Remote Sensing and Lai Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%