2002
DOI: 10.1080/09585190110092857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative importance of facial attractiveness and gender in Hong Kong selection decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the end of 2002, the beauty industry had become China's fourth largest consumer market and 1.54 million beauty parlors had been registered in China (Hu et al 2003). Chiu and Babcock (2002) found that an attractive face was more important than either grade point average or public exam performance in observer judgments of work skills of Hong Kong job candidates. Finally, as incomes have risen in China, rates of double eyelid surgery have increased dramatically as a means to improve the odds of success in work and love (Watts 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By the end of 2002, the beauty industry had become China's fourth largest consumer market and 1.54 million beauty parlors had been registered in China (Hu et al 2003). Chiu and Babcock (2002) found that an attractive face was more important than either grade point average or public exam performance in observer judgments of work skills of Hong Kong job candidates. Finally, as incomes have risen in China, rates of double eyelid surgery have increased dramatically as a means to improve the odds of success in work and love (Watts 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, height is positively correlated with workplace success and income (see Judge & Cable, 2004 for a metaanalytic review) and is positively associated with judgements of charisma and perceived competency in leaders (Blaker, Rompa, Dessing, Vriend, Herscheberg & van Vugt, 2013;Hamstra, 2014). In addition, measures of physical attractiveness are positively linked with performance in mock and real job interviews (Chiu & Babcock, 2002;Marlowe, Schneider & Nelson, 1996), salesperson performance (Ahearne, Gruen & Jarvis, 1999) and income (Frieze, Olson & Russel, 1991;Judge, Hurst & Simon, 2009). Moreover, CEOs of financially-successful companies are more likely to have 'robust' facial features, as indexed by a higher facial-width-to-height ratio, than their relatively less successful peers (Wong, Ormiston & Haselhuhn, 2011).…”
Section: Appearance and Social Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within organizational settings, there is substantial evidence that being attractive is associated with positive jobrelated outcomes (Hosoda, Stone-Romero, & Coats, 2003), such as enhanced perceptions of job qualifications (Shannon & Stark, 2003;Watkins & Johnston, 2000), hiring and promotion decisions (Chiu & Babcock, 2002;Marlowe, Schneider, & Nelson, 1996), recommendations for receiving higher starting salaries (French, 2002), and evaluations of career potential (Morrow, McElroy, Stamper, & Wilson, 1990). The conclusion of this research is apparently quite clear: Being attractive is good for one's career.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%