2002
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Importance of the Deep and Superficial Vascular Systems for Delay of the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap as Demonstrated in a Rat Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Sano et al found that the ligation of contralateral SIEVs is more effective than the ligation of contralateral DIEVs (93.84% Ϯ 5.85% vs. 72.17% Ϯ 11.27%) before TRAM flap elevation. 27 They also stated that ligation of contralateral SIEVs (93.84% Ϯ 5.85%) and ipsilateral (89.35% Ϯ 6.92%) or bilateral DIEVs (89.06% Ϯ 11.56%) resulted in significantly greater flap survival than other groups. 27 Clinically, an inferior incision and a bilateral deep inferior epigastric vessel ligation before TRAM flap elevation have been used in a high-risk patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 Sano et al found that the ligation of contralateral SIEVs is more effective than the ligation of contralateral DIEVs (93.84% Ϯ 5.85% vs. 72.17% Ϯ 11.27%) before TRAM flap elevation. 27 They also stated that ligation of contralateral SIEVs (93.84% Ϯ 5.85%) and ipsilateral (89.35% Ϯ 6.92%) or bilateral DIEVs (89.06% Ϯ 11.56%) resulted in significantly greater flap survival than other groups. 27 Clinically, an inferior incision and a bilateral deep inferior epigastric vessel ligation before TRAM flap elevation have been used in a high-risk patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 They also stated that ligation of contralateral SIEVs (93.84% Ϯ 5.85%) and ipsilateral (89.35% Ϯ 6.92%) or bilateral DIEVs (89.06% Ϯ 11.56%) resulted in significantly greater flap survival than other groups. 27 Clinically, an inferior incision and a bilateral deep inferior epigastric vessel ligation before TRAM flap elevation have been used in a high-risk patient population. 28 In another clinical study, bilateral division of both the SIEVs and DIEVs was advised to increase TRAM flap viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial concerns about a perceived higher rate of skin and fat necrosis when compared with DIEP were quelled by a systematic study using an animal model which has shown that there is no increased risk of necrosis associated with the DIEP flap. 6 The rat TRAM flap model has been used extensively in experimental studies investigating factors that affect flap survival, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, 7 delay procedures 8,9 and ischemic preconditioning 10 as well as the application of vasoactive agents such as nicotine 11 and vascular endothelial growth factor. [12][13][14][15][16] Moreover, these flaps have been employed in investigating possible future clinical applications of the TRAM flap including allotransplantation 17 and secretion of therapeutic proteins after gene transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%