2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
189
3
17

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
20
189
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…O-WOM is a relative quick, informal way of sharing opinions and experiences related to products with other consumers who are geographically dispersed (Cheung & Lee, 2012;East et al, 2007). O-WOM can be either positive or negative in nature, implying that one either encourages or discourages the consumption of a particular product (East et al, 2007).…”
Section: Negative O-wommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…O-WOM is a relative quick, informal way of sharing opinions and experiences related to products with other consumers who are geographically dispersed (Cheung & Lee, 2012;East et al, 2007). O-WOM can be either positive or negative in nature, implying that one either encourages or discourages the consumption of a particular product (East et al, 2007).…”
Section: Negative O-wommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O-WOM can be either positive or negative in nature, implying that one either encourages or discourages the consumption of a particular product (East et al, 2007). Recent study indicates that in particular negative O-WOM may have very strong effects on consumer behavior and even drives companies to make use of webcare teams.…”
Section: Negative O-wommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This postulation is justified by the fact that WOM is capable of supplementing the advertising and other communication techniques (Hogan et al 2004). It mostly takes place among friends and family members as the result of social interaction (East et al 2007;Prendergast et al 2002). Ang et al (2001) recommended that antipiracy agencies should use WOM to negatively influence the demand for counterfeits.…”
Section: Word Of Mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa ação tem se mostrado muito influente nas decisões e nas escolhas do consumidor (Arndt, 1967;East, Hammond, & Wright, 2007;Sweeney, Soutar, & Mazzarol, 2012), influenciando a experiência do cliente, os valores e o desempenho das empresas em ambientes de negócios atuais, que são interativos e dinâmicos (Doorn et al 2010;Wei, Miao, & Huang, 2013).…”
Section: Engajamento Do Consumidor E O Boca a Boca Eletrônicounclassified