2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2007.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative influence of competitive intensity and business strategy on the relationship between financial leverage and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
111
2
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
14
111
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Firm's size and growth may influence performance since larger firms tend to enjoy economies of scale, which may positively influence financial results (Jermias 2008). Therefore, a positive relationship between firm's size and financial performance is expected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firm's size and growth may influence performance since larger firms tend to enjoy economies of scale, which may positively influence financial results (Jermias 2008). Therefore, a positive relationship between firm's size and financial performance is expected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5;2016 these contingencies while studying leverage-performance relation. Farooq et al (2014) and Jermias (2008) studied firm's strategy and market competition as moderator to the leverage-performance relation. Similarly, Gleason, Mathur, and Mathur (2000) found culture as important moderator to the leverage-performance relation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competitive intensity in the industry represents the power's center and axis that contributes to determining the industry attractiveness, and among the factors affecting the determination of the competition intensity is the industry growth, the fixed cost portion to the total value added to the activity, and the extent of depth in product differentiation, and finally the balance and centralization between the competitors (Jermias, 2008). Thus, if an industry characterized by a high growth and fixed costs relatively low, and a wide extent of the product differentiation possibility, and a high degree of centralization, then the importance is the available of greater profitability opportunities for most of the participants in the industry and vice versa (Cui, Griffith, & Cavusgil, 2005).…”
Section: Competitive Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%