2007
DOI: 10.1515/crelle.2007.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative isoperimetric inequality in Cartan-Hadamard 3-manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the relative isoperimetric inequality in M 3 was proved in [6]. In this paper we prove the inequality in M 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recently, the relative isoperimetric inequality in M 3 was proved in [6]. In this paper we prove the inequality in M 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Reasoning as in [4], one can easily see that equality is never attained if C is strictly convex. The analysis of equality in the isoperimetric inequality for a general convex set cannot be treated with the tools used in this paper.…”
Section: Remark 54mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For n 3 some partial results were known: Kim [11] proved (1) for C = U × R, where U is the epigraph of a C 2 convex function, and Choe [2] proved (1) when ∂D ∩ ∂C is a graph which is symmetric about (n − 1) hyperplanes of R n . More recently, Choe and Ritoré [4] have shown that (1) holds outside convex sets in 3D Cartan-Hadamard manifolds, with equality if and only if D is a flat half ball and := ∂D ∼ ∂C is a hemisphere. The main ingredients of the proof in [4] are the estimate (sup H 2 ) area 2π, and the analysis of the equality case, where H is the mean curvature of ; however, the methods used in [4], which were inspired by the work of Li and Yau [12], are valid only when n = 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations