1990
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.1990.573006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Merits Of Spot HRV And Landsat TM Images For Forest Cover Change Detection In Forillon National Park, Quebec, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater spectral resolution provided by the additional infrared bands of Landsat TM likely explain its slightly higher overall accuracy and kappa value. Several studies comparing the classification accuracies of vegetation from TM and SPOT data have produced similar results (Buttner & Csillag 1988;Godard et al 1990;Gao 1999). These studies indicated that the additional spectral bands of the TM data were more important than the additional spatial resolution of SPOT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater spectral resolution provided by the additional infrared bands of Landsat TM likely explain its slightly higher overall accuracy and kappa value. Several studies comparing the classification accuracies of vegetation from TM and SPOT data have produced similar results (Buttner & Csillag 1988;Godard et al 1990;Gao 1999). These studies indicated that the additional spectral bands of the TM data were more important than the additional spatial resolution of SPOT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This capability is not present in Quickbird as it does not capture in the mid-infrared range. Many researchers have commented on the advantage provided by the greater spectral resolution of Landsat TM in vegetation classification (Buttner & Csillag 1988;Godard et al 1990;Michele Basham May et al 1997;Gao 1999;Harvey & Hill 2001). When certain vegetation types occur in small patches, then the greater spatial resolution of Quickbird or SPOT may be better suited for vegetation classification (Michele Basham May et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage could only be detected in homogeneous stands using the normalized difference vegetation index. Godard et al (1990) were able to map spruce budworm defoliation by Landsat TM data, but not by SPOT data in Canada. Joria et al (1991) compared SPOT and TM data in mapping three levels of gypsy moth defoliation in Michigan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This knowledge is presented in Table 3. For spectral band TM5, a specific use is tree defoliation [11,12] that can be caused, in the studied area, by spruce budworm. As our map didn't show any defoliated forest stands we have found the spectral values in another study [11] and we have calibrated the reflectance values to fit our conifers reflectance values.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%