2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has suggested that alignment gaps can be a valuable source of phylogenetic signal (Egan and Crandall, 2008;Simmons et al, 2007). In order to code for gaps we treated each indel as a simple binary character (Simmons and Ochoterena, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has suggested that alignment gaps can be a valuable source of phylogenetic signal (Egan and Crandall, 2008;Simmons et al, 2007). In order to code for gaps we treated each indel as a simple binary character (Simmons and Ochoterena, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sampled the chain every 100 generations, and discarded the first 25% of the samples (which generally corresponded to when likelihood values became stationary) as the burn-in. Although utilization of gaps as character data can be phylogenetically informative in parsimony-based analyses, there are few well-tested methods for implementing gap information into model-based approaches to phylogenetic inference (Simmons et al, 2007, Phillips et al, 2000, and we thus treated all gaps as missing data. Although the majority of species were sequenced for all three loci (Table 1), because of logistical constraints (multiple failed sequencing attempts for some species-locus combinations), not all loci were sequenced for each species, and thus portions of our dataset were missing.…”
Section: Tree Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. If different equally plausible alignments would lead to different (possibly spurious) synapomorphies, and it cannot be decided which one is preferable based on overall similarity of the Simmons et al 2007) was applied to those informative indels that could be placed with confidence. In a few cases, however, where short insertions of different size and/or different sequence suggesting a possibly different origin have been found in the same position relative to the majority of the taxa or where indels were caused by single nucleotide repeats of different lengths, we preferred to use a single multistate character.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%