1996
DOI: 10.1080/096031096334439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative performance of the PER and PSR filters with stochastic dominance: evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In no case did either a simple P/S or P/E portfolio provide the highest return of the six strategies investigated. Taken together, these results are consistent with previous studies that found the P/S ratio was a better selection criterion than the P/E ratio (e.g., Nathan et al, 2001;Vruwink et al, 2007;Barbee et al, 2008), and inconsistent with previous studies that found the opposite (e.g., Senchak & Martin, 1987;Chou & Liao, 1996). However, our results strongly suggest that reliance upon either single investment criterion is no guarantee of superior investment performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In no case did either a simple P/S or P/E portfolio provide the highest return of the six strategies investigated. Taken together, these results are consistent with previous studies that found the P/S ratio was a better selection criterion than the P/E ratio (e.g., Nathan et al, 2001;Vruwink et al, 2007;Barbee et al, 2008), and inconsistent with previous studies that found the opposite (e.g., Senchak & Martin, 1987;Chou & Liao, 1996). However, our results strongly suggest that reliance upon either single investment criterion is no guarantee of superior investment performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…With risk-free rate Saturday Levy and Lerman (1985) and Chou and Liao (1996). b The mixture quantile Q b (p) = aQ W (p) + (1 À a)r f calculated for r f = 0.0137% and a = 0.47 as Q b (p) = 0.47Q W (p) + 0.53 · 0.0137%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar calculation can also consult Levy and Lerman (1985) and Chou and Liao (1996) paper. a. C.D.F.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 94%